Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies

Open access
Smith‐Warner, Stephanie A., Spiegelman, Donna, Yaun, Shiaw‐Shyuan, Albanes, Demetrius, Beeson, W. Lawrence, van den Brandt, Piet A., Feskanich, Diane, Folsom, Aaron R., Fraser, Gary E., Freudenheim, Jo L., Giovannucci, Edward, Goldbohm, R. Alexandra, Graham, Saxon, Kushi, Lawrence H., Miller, Anthony B., Pietinen, Pirjo, Rohan, Thomas E., Speizer, Frank E., Willett, Walter C., Hunter, David J.·2003·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Inverse associations between fruit and vegetable consumption and lung cancer risk have been consistently reported. However, identifying the specific fruits and vegetables associated with lung cancer is difficult because the food groups and foods evaluated have varied across studies. We analyzed fruit and vegetable groups using standardized exposure and covariate definitions in 8 prospective studies. We combined study‐specific relative risks (RRs) using a random effects model. In the pooled database, 3,206 incident lung cancer cases occurred among 430,281 women and men followed for up to 6–16 years across studies. Controlling for smoking habits and other lung cancer risk factors, a 16–23% reduction in lung cancer risk was observed for quintiles 2 through 5 vs. the lowest quintile of consumption for total fruits (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.67–0.87 for quintile 5; p‐value, test for trend < 0.001) and for total fruits and vegetables (RR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.69–0.90; p‐value, test for trend = 0.001). For the same comparison, the association was weaker for total vegetable consumption (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.78–1.00; p‐value, test for trend = 0.12). Associations were similar between never, past, and current smokers. These results suggest that elevated fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a modest reduction in lung cancer risk, which is mostly attributable to fruit, not vegetable, intake. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that our results are due to residual confounding by smoking. The primary focus for reducing lung cancer incidence should continue to be smoking prevention and cessation. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.11490

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Smith‐Warner, S. A., Spiegelman, D., Yaun, S., Albanes, D., Beeson, W. L., van den Brandt, P. A., Feskanich, D., Folsom, A. R., Fraser, G. E., Freudenheim, J. L., Giovannucci, E., Goldbohm, R. A., Graham, S., Kushi, L. H., Miller, A. B., Pietinen, P., Rohan, T. E., Speizer, F. E., Willett, W. C., & Hunter, D. J.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-18
Volume
107
Issue
6
Pages
1001-1011
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2071377067
Cited by
187
References
9
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.11490
The paper
Smith‐Warner, S. A., Spiegelman, D., Yaun, S., Albanes, D., Beeson, W. L., van den Brandt, P. A., Feskanich, D., Folsom, A. R., Fraser, G. E., Freudenheim, J. L., Giovannucci, E., Goldbohm, R. A., Graham, S., Kushi, L. H., Miller, A. B., Pietinen, P., Rohan, T. E., Speizer, F. E., Willett, W. C., & Hunter, D. J. (2003). Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer: A pooled analysis of cohort studies. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11490

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.