Cited by 76Child Abuse and TraumaPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Childhood maltreatment and prospectively observed quality of early care as predictors of antisocial personality disorder features

Open access
Shi, Zhenyu, Bureau, Jean‐Francois, Easterbrooks, M. Ann, Zhao, Xudong, Lyons‐Ruth, Karlen·2012·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Few studies have evaluated the separate contributions of maltreatment and ongoing quality of parent–child interaction to the etiology of antisocial personality features using a prospective longitudinal design. One hundred twenty low‐income young adults (aged 18–23) were assessed for extent of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) features on the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis (M.B. First, R.L. Spitzer, M. Gibbon, & J.B.W. Williams, 1997) for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) Axis II, for presence of maltreatment on the Conflict Tactics Scale (M.A. Straus, S.L. Hamby, D. Finkelhor, D.W. Moore, & D. Runyan, 1998), Traumatic Experiences Scale (L. Dutra, J.F. Bureau, B. Holmes, A. Lyubchik, & K. Lyons‐Ruth, 2009), and Adult Attachment Interview (C. George, N. Kaplan, & M. Main, 1984), and for referral in infancy to parent–infant clinical services. Fifty‐six of these families had been studied longitudinally since the first year of life. In infancy, attachment disorganization and disrupted mother–infant interaction were assessed; in middle childhood, disorganized‐controlling attachment behaviors were reliably rated. In kindergarten and second grade, behavior problems were assessed by teacher report. In cross‐sectional analyses, maltreatment was significantly associated with ASPD features, but did not account for the independent effect of early referral to parent–infant services on ASPD features. In longitudinal analyses, maternal withdrawal in infancy predicted the extent of ASPD features 20 years later, independently of childhood abuse. In middle childhood, disorganized attachment behavior and maladaptive behavior at school added to prediction of later ASPD features. Antisocial features in young adulthood have precursors in the minute‐to‐minute process of parent–child interaction beginning in infancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.20295

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The validity of maternal AMBIANCE classification has been confirmed by meta-analysis for infant attachment disorganization and in individual studies for adolescent psychiatric outcomes.

    “Validity of maternal AMBIANCE classification has been confirmed by meta-analysis in relation to infant attachment disorganization (57) and, in individual studies, in relation to adolescent psychiatric outcomes (72, 75, 76).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Connell DB Individual differences in attachment: An investigation into stability, implications, and relationships to structure of early language development 1976 Syracuse University Syracuse, NY (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
  2. Moffitt TE Caspi A Rutter M Silva PA Sex differences in antisocial behavior 2001 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, Z., Bureau, J., Easterbrooks, M. A., Zhao, X., & Lyons‐Ruth, K.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Lyons‐Ruth, Karlen
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
55-69
ISSN
  • 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0355
OpenAlex
W2162420580
Cited by
76
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062030)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
child abuse, antisocial personality disorder, parent-infant interaction, disorganized attachment, child behavior problems, low-income young adults, etiology of antisocial behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review