Cited by 313Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minding the baby: enhancing reflectiveness to improve early health and relationship outcomes in an interdisciplinary home-visiting program.

Open access
Sadler, Lois S., Slade, Arietta, Close, Nancy, Webb, Denise L., Simpson, Tanika, Fennie, Kristopher, Mayes, Linda C.·2013·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

® (MTB), an interdisciplinary, mentalization-based intervention in which home visiting services are provided by a team that includes a nurse practitioner and a clinical social worker. Families are recruited during mother's pregnancy and continue through the child's second birthday. Analyses revealed that intervention families were more likely to be on track with immunization schedules at 12 months, had lower rates of rapid subsequent childbearing, and were less likely to be referred to child protective services. In addition, mother-infant interactions were less likely to be disrupted at 4 months when mothers were teenagers, and all intervention infants were more likely to be securely attached, and less likely to be disorganized in relation to attachment at one year. Finally, mothers' capacity to reflect on their own and their child's experience improved over the course of the intervention in the most high-risk mothers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.21406

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bronfman E., 1999, Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification (AMBIANCE): Manual for coding disrupted affective communication, Version 2
  2. Carlson E., 1995, Developmental processes and psychopathology, 581
  3. Fraiberg S., 1980, Clinical studies in infant mental health
  4. Grienenberger J., Handbook of contemporary psychodynamic approaches to psychopathology
  5. Kaplan‐Sarnoff M., 2007, Healthy steps manual
  6. Kelly K., 2003, Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification (AMBIANCE): An adaptation for four month old babies and their mothers
  7. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080054039 · DOI
  8. Klerman L.V., 2004, Another chance: Preventing additional births to teen mothers
  9. Levy D., 2001, Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development
  10. Poznansky O., 2010, Stability and change in maternal reflective functioning in early childhood
  11. Shonkoff J., 2000, From neurons to neighborhoods
  12. Slade A., 2003, The Pregnancy Interview
  13. Slade A., 2004, The Parent Development Interview‐Revised: Unpublished protocol
  14. Slade A., 2005, Manual for scoring reflective functioning on the Parent Development Interview
  15. Slade A., 2002, Special issue: Perinatal mental health, Zero to Three
  16. Slade A., 2005, Enhancing early attachments, 152
  17. Weinfield N.S., 2008, Handbook of attachment, 78

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 313

Metadata

Authors
Sadler, L. S., Slade, A., Close, N., Webb, D. L., Simpson, T., Fennie, K., & Mayes, L. C.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Sadler, Lois S.
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-08
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
391-405
ISSN
  • 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0355
OpenAlex
W1527140437
Cited by
313
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
17.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (P30NR008999)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024139)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057947, R21HD048591)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
mentalization-based interventions, home visits, maternal attachment, secure attachment, disorganized attachment, vaccination schedule, child protective services referrals, adolescent mothers, high-risk mothers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review