Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineering bone‐like tissue in vitro using human bone marrow stem cells and silk scaffolds

Meinel, Lorenz, Karageorgiou, Vassilis, Hofmann, Sandra, Fajardo, Robert, Snyder, Brian, Li, Chunmei, Zichner, Ludwig, Langer, Robert, Vunjak‐Novakovic, Gordana, Kaplan, David L.·2004·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Porous biodegradable silk scaffolds and human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were used to engineer bone‐like tissue in vitro. Two different scaffolds with the same microstructure were studied: collagen (to assess the effects of fast degradation) and silk with covalently bound RGD sequences (to assess the effects of enhanced cell attachment and slow degradation). The hMSCs were isolated, expanded in culture, characterized with respect to the expression of surface markers and ability for chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation, seeded on scaffolds, and cultured for up to 4 weeks. Histological analysis and microcomputer tomography showed the development of up to 1.2‐mm‐long interconnected and organized bonelike trabeculae with cuboid cells on the silk‐RGD scaffolds, features still present but to a lesser extent on silk scaffolds and absent on the collagen scaffolds. The X‐ray diffraction pattern of the deposited bone corresponded to hydroxyapatite present in the native bone. Biochemical analysis showed increased mineralization on silk‐RGD scaffolds compared with either silk or collagen scaffolds after 4 weeks. Expression of bone sialoprotein, osteopontin, and bone morphogenetic protein 2 was significantly higher for hMSCs cultured in osteogenic than control medium both after 2 and 4 weeks in culture. The results suggest that RGD‐silk scaffolds are particularly suitable for autologous bone tissue engineering, presumably because of their stable macroporous structure, tailorable mechanical properties matching those of native bone, and slow degradation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 71A: 25–34, 2004

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.30117

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Meinel, L., Karageorgiou, V., Hofmann, S., Fajardo, R., Snyder, B., Li, C., Zichner, L., Langer, R., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., & Kaplan, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-12
Volume
71A
Issue
1
Pages
25-34
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2148399690
Cited by
349
References
4
FWCI
18.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering bone‐like tissue in vitro using human bone marrow stem cells and silk scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30117
The paper
Meinel, L., Karageorgiou, V., Hofmann, S., Fajardo, R., Snyder, B., Li, C., Zichner, L., Langer, R., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2004). Engineering bone‐like tissue in vitro using human bone marrow stem cells and silk scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.