Cited by 55Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

Elucidating Posttraumatic Stress Symptom Profiles and Their Correlates Among Women Experiencing Bidirectional Intimate Partner Violence: PTSD Symptom Profiles Among IPV-Exposed Women

Open access
Hellmuth, Julianne C., Jaquier, Véronique, Swan, Suzanne C., Sullivan, Tami P.·2014·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study employed latent class analysis to identify profiles of women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) based on the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. METHOD: Self-report data from a sample of 369 women experiencing bidirectional IPV was used. RESULTS: A 3-class solution comprising low, moderate, and high PTSD severity profiles best fit the data. Profiles were differentially related to whether IPV victimization was considered traumatic (PTSD criterion A); whether functioning was impaired as a result of PTSD symptoms (PTSD criterion F); whether the woman met full diagnostic criteria for PTSD; depression symptom severity; and severity of psychological, physical, and sexual IPV victimization and use of IPV. An extremely high percentage of women in the high (96%) and moderate (88%) severity classes experienced functional impairment, although many did not meet full diagnostic criteria for PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the need for interventions individually tailored to one's treatment needs based on the nature of one's traumatic stressor and the impact of PTSD on daily functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.22100

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Foa EB 1995 Posttraumatic stress diagnostic scale manual Minneapolis, MN National Computer Systems Pearson, Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hellmuth, J. C., Jaquier, V., Swan, S. C., & Sullivan, T. P.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Tami P.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-19
Volume
70
Issue
10
Pages
1008-1021
ISSN
0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150102704
Cited by
55
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Justice (2001-WT-BX-050)
  • National Institutes of Health (T32DA019426)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, intimate partner violence, functional disability, depression, sexual violence, physical violence, psychological violence, women, trauma
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Spouse Abuse, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review