Cited by 331Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchOccupational Health and PerformanceResilience and Mental Health

The relation of perceived and received social support to mental health among first responders: a meta‐analytic review

Prati, Gabriele, Pietrantoni, Luca·2010·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

There are plenty of theories that may support the protective role of social support in the aftermath of potentially traumatic events. This meta‐analytic review examined the role of received and perceived social support in promoting mental health among first responders (e.g., firefighters, police officers, and paramedics or emergency medical services personnel). Results showed that the effect sizes derived from 37 empirical studies ranged from 0 to 0.46. The overall weighted mean effect size was of medium magnitude (r=0.27). Moreover, moderator analysis showed that the effect size of perceived social support (r=0.31) was significantly higher than the effect size of received social support (r=0.22). Participants' age and gender or research design did not exert an influence on the relationship between social support and mental health. Theoretical implications and limitations are discussed. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.20371

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Municipal/provincial police may have more access to structural and social supports from consistent urban deployment, whereas RCMP relocate frequently and often to rural areas, which would have less access to such supports.

    “municipal/provincial police may have more access to structural and social supports from consistent urban deployment, whereas RCMP relocate frequently and often to rural areas, which would have less access to such supports.53,54”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prati, G., & Pietrantoni, L.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Prati, Gabriele
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
403-417
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W1996968451
Cited by
331
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
perceived social support, received social support, mental health, first responders, firefighters, police officers, paramedics, emergency medical personnel, post-traumatic stress, protective factors, potentially traumatic events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review