Cited by 18Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCounseling Practices and Supervision

Understanding the experience of mentor families in therapeutic youth mentoring

Weiler, Lindsey M., Zimmerman, Toni S., Haddock, Shelley, Krafchick, Jennifer·2014·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

The fragility of youth‐adult mentoring relationships requires innovative program components to support and sustain these relationships and enhance participant outcomes. The current study presents and explores the experience of a unique mentoring program component known as Mentor Families, in which three to four pairs of mentors and mentees engage in structured activities together. Grounded theory methods were utilized to explore the experiences of mentors (n = 212) and mentees (n = 87) involved in Mentor Families within a mentoring program for adolescents at risk for delinquency. Findings from the current study reveal that Mentor Families provides a place (a) for mentors to receive support and supervision, (b) for mentors and mentees to belong, and (c) for mentees to grow and learn. These findings suggest that Mentor Families warrants further investigation as to how they may positively affect mentoring relationships and programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.21595

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating structured group activities within the relationship was associated with mentors' satisfaction in a short-term therapeutic mentoring program.

    “Finally, integrating structured group activities within the relationship was associated with mentors’ satisfaction in a short-term therapeutic mentoring program, as reported in a qualitative study [78].”
  • The emotional component is the most frequently engaged and includes aspects of trust, reliability, consistency, support, and authenticity in mentoring programs in all formats operating with American, European, Israeli, and Australian youth.

    “The emotional component, which is the most frequently engaged, includes aspects of trust, reliability, consistency, support, and authenticity in mentoring programs in all formats operating with American, European, Israeli, and Australian youth [78,80,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiler, L. M., Zimmerman, T. S., Haddock, S., & Krafchick, J.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Weiler, Lindsey M.
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-09
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
80-98
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W2132582344
Cited by
18
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
mentoring relationships, sense of belonging, youth development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review