Cited by 4Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup PsychologySocial Movements and Cultural Identity

Gender differences in perceived racism threat and activism during the Black Lives Matter social justice movement for Black young adults

Open access
Lafreniere, Bianca, Audet, Élodie C., Kachanoff, Frank, Christophe, N. Keita, Holding, Anne C., Janusauskas, Lauren, Koestner, Richard·2023·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

A longitudinal study involving 455 Black young adults living in Canada investigated whether gender and autonomous motivation influenced the relationship between perceived racism threat and Black Lives Matter (BLM) activism, and whether BLM activism influenced life satisfaction over time. A moderated mediation analysis using PROCESS Macro Model 58 tested the indirect effect of autonomous motivation on the relationship between perceived racism threat and BLM activism varying by gender. Multiple linear regression assessed how well BLM activism predicted life satisfaction. Black women perceived greater racism threat than Black men related to increases in BLM activism via the influence of autonomous motivation. BLM activism had a positive influence on life satisfaction over time, regardless of gender. This research suggests Black young women are playing pivotal roles in the BLM movement and helps us understand how motivation may be influencing involvement and well‐being in social justice issues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.23043

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have shown that civic engagement, most notably protest action, can possibly attenuate the negative effect of discrimination on well-being.

    “Some studies have shown that civic engagement, most notably protest action, can possibly attenuate the negative effect of discrimination on well-being (e.g., Lafreniere et al., 2023; Sohi & Singh, 2015 ).”

    From The Effect of Civic Engagement on Different Dimensions of Well-Being in Youth: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as Lafreniere et al., 2023

    The Results (§3.3; page unavailable) report that BLM activism positively predicted later life satisfaction, and the Discussion (§4; page unavailable) proposes that activism may buffer stress. The study does not show that activism attenuated the effect of discrimination on well-being, nor does it report a separate finding for protest action. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Black Lives Matter activism (mixed protesting and online participation) among Black young adults living in Canada had a positive cross-sectional association with life satisfaction.

    “Also, Lafreniere et al. (2023 ) found that Black Lives Matter (BLM) activism (mixed pro -testing and online participation) among Black young adults living in Canada had a positive cross-sectional association with life satisfaction.”
  • Protest action positively predicted life satisfaction.

    “On the other hand, the longitudinal study of Lafreniere et al. ( 2023) supported the opposite direction, that protest action positively predicted life satisfaction.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chatillon, A. (2017). Framing murder: Black Lives Matter as reproductive justice [Doctoral dissertation, UC Santa Barbara].
  2. n21 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gillespie, A., & Brown, N. E. (2019). # BlackGirlMagic demystified. Phylon (1960), 56(2), 37-58.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lafreniere, B., Audet, É. C., Kachanoff, F., Christophe, N. K., Holding, A. C., Janusauskas, L., & Koestner, R.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lafreniere, Bianca
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-03
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
2741-2757
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W4362522052
Cited by
4
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
Keywords
Black Lives Matter, activism, gender differences, autonomous motivation, Black young adults, life satisfaction, Black women, well-being
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Sex Factors, Social Justice, Young Adult, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review