Cited by 154Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrailty in Older Adults

Diagnosis of sarcopenia by evaluating skeletal muscle mass by adjusted bioimpedance analysis validated with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Open access
Cheng, Keith Yu‐Kin, Chow, Simon Kwoon‐Ho, Hung, Vivian Wing‐Yin, Wong, Carissa Hing‐Wai, Wong, Ronald Man‐Yeung, Tsang, Charlotte Sau‐Lan, Kwok, Timothy, Cheung, Wing‐Hoi·2021·Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to adjust and cross‐validate skeletal muscle mass measurements between bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the screening of sarcopenia in the community and to estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia in Hong Kong. Methods Screening of sarcopenia was provided to community‐dwelling older adults. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was evaluated by BIA (InBody 120 or 720) and/or DXA. Handgrip strength and/or gait speed were assessed. Diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on the 2019 revised Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia cut‐offs. Agreement analysis was performed to cross‐validate ASM measurements by BIA and DXA. Multiple regression was used to explore contribution of measured parameters in predicting DXA ASM from BIA. Results A total of 1587 participants (age = 72 ± 12 years) were recruited; 1065 participants were screened by BIA (InBody 120) with 18 followed up by DXA, while the remaining 522 participants were assessed by the BIA (InBody 720) and DXA. The appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) evaluated by BIA showed a mean difference of 2.89 ± 0.38 kg/m 2 (InBody 120) and 2.97 ± 0.45 kg/m 2 (InBody 720) against DXA gold standard. A significant overestimation of muscle mass was measured by BIA compared with DXA ( P < 0.005). BIA data were adjusted using prediction equation and mean difference reduced to −0.02 ± 0.31 kg/m 2 in cross‐validation. Prevalence of sarcopenia in older adults ≥65 ranged from 39.4% (based on ASMI by DXA) to 40.8% (based on predicted DXA ASMI from BIA). Low ASMI by DXA was found in 68.5% of the older adults screened. The percentage of older adults exhibited low handgrip strength ranged from 31.3% to 56%, while 49% showed low gait speed. Conclusions Bioimpedance analysis was found to overestimate skeletal muscle mass compared with DXA. With adjustment equations, BIA can be used as a quick and reliable tool for screening sarcopenia in community and clinical settings with limited access to better options.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcsm.12825

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, K. Y., Chow, S. K., Hung, V. W., Wong, C. H., Wong, R. M., Tsang, C. S., Kwok, T., & Cheung, W.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chow, Simon Kwoon‐Ho
Venue
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-10-04
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
2163-2173
ISSN
  • 2190-5991 (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-6009
OpenAlex
W3202032823
Cited by
154
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (4054479)
  • Health and Medical Research Fund (HCPS 02180118)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
sarcopenia, skeletal muscle mass, bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, appendicular skeletal muscle mass index, cross-validation, prediction equations, sarcopenia screening, older adults, grip strength, walking speed, sarcopenia prevalence, Hong Kong, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria, measurement overestimation, community-dwelling
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Composition, Humans, Middle Aged, Absorptiometry, Photon, Electric Impedance, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review