Cited by 297Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

What makes a BIA equation unique? Validity of eight-electrode multifrequency BIA to estimate body composition in a healthy adult population

Bosy-Westphal, A, Schautz, B, Later, W, Kehayias, J J, Gallagher, D, Müller, M J·2013·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background/objectives The validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) for body composition analysis is limited by assumptions relating to body shape. Improvement in BIA technology could overcome these limitations and reduce the population specificity of the BIA algorithm. Subjects/methods BIA equations for the prediction of fat-free mass (FFM), total body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) were generated from data obtained on 124 Caucasians (body mass index 18.5-35 kg/m(2)) using a four-compartment model and dilution techniques as references. The algorithms were validated in an independent multiethnic population (n=130). The validity of BIA results was compared (i) between ethnic groups and (ii) with results from the four-compartment model and two-compartment methods (air-displacement plethysmography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and deuterium dilution). Results Indices were developed from segmental R and Xc values to represent the relative contribution of trunk and limbs to total body conductivity. The coefficient of determination for all prediction equations was high (R(2): 0.94 for ECW, 0.98 for FFM and 0.98 for TBW) and root mean square error was low (1.9 kg for FFM, 0.8 l for ECW and 1.3 kg for TBW). The bias between BIA results and different reference methods was not statistically different between Afro-American, Hispanic, Asian or Caucasian populations and showed a similar difference (-0.2-0.2 kg FFM) when compared with the bias between different two-compartment reference methods (-0.2-0.3 kg FFM). Conclusions An eight-electrode, segmental multifrequency BIA is a valid tool to estimate body composition in healthy euvolemic adults compared with the validity and precision of other two-compartment reference methods. Population specificity is of minor importance when compared with discrepancies between different reference methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejcn.2012.160

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosy-Westphal, A., Schautz, B., Later, W., Kehayias, J. J., Gallagher, D., & Müller, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2013-01
Volume
67
Issue
S1
Pages
S14-S21
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2018773294
Cited by
297
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, body composition, fat-free mass, total body water, extracellular water, ethnic differences, population specificity, four-compartment model
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Algorithms, Anthropometry, Black or African American, Body Composition, Body Fluid Compartments, Electrodes, Female

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review