Cited by 422Nutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older AdultsBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Validating the SARC-F: A Suitable Community Screening Tool for Sarcopenia?

Woo, Jean, Leung, Jason, Morley, John E.·2014·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objectives Using data from the Hong Kong Mr and Ms Os study, we validated the SARC-F against 3 consensus definitions of sarcopenia from Europe, Asia, and an international group, and compared the ability of all 4 measures to predict 4-year physical limitation, walking speed, and repeated chair stands.Design Prospective cohort study.Setting Hong Kong community.Participants Four thousand men and women living in the community.Measurements A questionnaire regarding ability to carry a heavy load, walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls frequency was administered. These questions were used to calculate the SARC-F score. Measurements, including appendicular muscle mass, were taken using dual-energy X-ray, grip strength using a dynamometer, 6-m gait speed, and time taken for repeated chair stand. Classification using the SARC-F score was compared using consensus panel criteria from international, European, and Asian sarcopenia working groups. The performance of all 4 methods was compared by examining the predictive ability for 4-year outcomes using ROC curve.Results The SARC-F has excellent specificity but poor sensitivity for sarcopenia classification; however, all 4 methods have comparable but modest predictive power for 4-year physical limitation.Conclusion The SARC-F may be considered a suitable tool for community screening for sarcopenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.04.021

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SARC-F includes five components: strength, assistance walking, rise from a chair, climbing stairs and history of falls, and can be used in the screening phase for older adults, since it has not been currently validated in younger age categories.

    “For example, the SARC-F [31,32] includes fi ve components: strength, assistance walking, rise from a chair, climbing stairs and history of falls, and can be used in the screening phase for older adults, since it has not been currently validated in younger age categories.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woo, J., Leung, J., & Morley, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Woo, Jean
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
630-634
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022173684
Cited by
422
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 9
FWCI
19.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
SARC-F, sarcopenia, screening tool validation, community-based screening, physical limitations, walking speed, chair stand, grip strength, appendicular skeletal muscle mass, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Geriatric Assessment, Risk Assessment, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review