Cited by 7Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Model application to quantitatively evaluate placental features from ultrasound images with gestational diabetes

Sun, Hongshuang, Jiao, Jing, Ren, Yunyun, Guo, Yi, Wang, Yuanyuan·2022·Journal of Clinical Ultrasound

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to introduce PFCnet (placental features classification network), an multimodel model for evaluating and classifying placental features in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and normal late pregnancy. Deep learning algorithms could be utilized to fully automate the examination of alterations in the placenta caused by hyperglycemia. METHODS: A total of 718 placental ultrasound images, including 139 cases of GDM, were collected, including gray-scale images (GSIs) and microflow images (MFIs). Ultrasonic assessment parameters and perinatal features were recorded. We divided gestational age into two categories for analysis (37 weeks and 37 weeks) based on the cut-off value level of placental maturity. The PFCnet model was introduced for identifying placental characteristics from normal and GDM pregnancies after extensive training and optimization. The model was scored using metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: In view of multimodal fusion (GSIs and MFIs) and deep network optimization training, the overall diagnostic performance of the PFCnet model depending on the region of interest (ROI) was excellent (AUC: 93%), with a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 92%, and an accuracy of 92% in the independent test set. The fusion features of GSIs and MFIs in the placenta showed a higher discriminative power than single-mode features (accuracy: Fusion 92% vs. GSIs 84% vs. MFIs 82%). The independent test set at 37 weeks exhibited a better specificity (75% vs. 69%) but a lower sensitivity(95% vs. 100%). CONCLUSIONS: With its dual channel identification of placental parenchymal and vascular lesions in obstetric complications, the PFCnet classification model has the potential to be a useful tool for detecting placental tissue abnormalities caused by hyperglycemia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcu.23233

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, H., Jiao, J., Ren, Y., Guo, Y., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ren, Yunyun
  • Guo, Yi
  • Wang, Yuanyuan
Venue
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07-10
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
976-983
ISSN
  • 0091-2751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0096
OpenAlex
W4285007515
Cited by
7
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, placental ultrasound, deep learning classification, multimodal image fusion, placental vascular lesions, placental maturity, late pregnancy
MeSH terms
Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Infant, Newborn, Placenta, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review