Cited by 2,276Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Gestational Diabetes and the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Kim, Catherine, Newton, Katherine M., Knopp, Robert H.·2002·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To examine factors associated with variation in the risk for type 2 diabetes in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We conducted a systematic literature review of articles published between January 1965 and August 2001, in which subjects underwent testing for GDM and then testing for type 2 diabetes after delivery. We abstracted diagnostic criteria for GDM and type 2 diabetes, cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes, and factors that predicted incidence of type 2 diabetes. RESULTS—A total of 28 studies were examined. After the index pregnancy, the cumulative incidence of diabetes ranged from 2.6% to over 70% in studies that examined women 6 weeks postpartum to 28 years postpartum. Differences in rates of progression between ethnic groups was reduced by adjustment for various lengths of follow-up and testing rates, so that women appeared to progress to type 2 diabetes at similar rates after a diagnosis of GDM. Cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes increased markedly in the first 5 years after delivery and appeared to plateau after 10 years. An elevated fasting glucose level during pregnancy was the risk factor most commonly associated with future risk of type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS—Conversion of GDM to type 2 diabetes varies with the length of follow-up and cohort retention. Adjustment for these differences reveals rapid increases in the cumulative incidence occurring in the first 5 years after delivery for different racial groups. Targeting women with elevated fasting glucose levels during pregnancy may prove to have the greatest effect for the effort required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1862

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Risk factors for the progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus include maternal age, family history of diabetes, glycemic indices during pregnancy, and genetic predisposition, which are not modifiable after delivery.

    “The risk factors for the progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus include maternal age, family history of diabetes, glycemic indices during pregnancy, and genetic predisposition, which are not modifiable after delivery [10,46].”

    From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnostic Approaches and Maternal-Offspring Complications (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    In “Other risk factors for type 2 diabetes” (page not provided), the review identifies elevated fasting glucose during pregnancy as a predictor of later diabetes. It reports that maternal age and family history were generally not associated with progression, contrary to their inclusion as established risk factors. The passages do not establish genetic predisposition as a predictor or characterize the listed factors collectively as unmodifiable after delivery. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GDM is often indicative of underlying β-cell dysfunction, which confers marked increased risk for later development of diabetes, generally but not always type 2 diabetes, in the mother after delivery.

    “GDM is often indicative of underlying b -cell dysfunction (200), which confers marked increased risk for later development of diabetes, generally but not always type 2 diabetes, in the mother after delivery (201,202).”

    From 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [202]

    The introduction and Conclusions (page numbers unavailable in our copy) identify GDM as a risk factor for maternal type 2 diabetes and report that progression rises steeply in the first five years after delivery. The paper examines type 2 diabetes, but does not establish the claim’s qualification that later diabetes is sometimes another type. The β-cell dysfunction clause is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GDM is often indicative of underlying beta-cell dysfunction, which confers marked increased risk for later development of glucose intolerance and diabetes in the mother after delivery.

    “GDM is often indicative of underlying b-cell dysfunction (182), which confers marked increased risk for later development of glucose intolerance and diabetes in the mother after delivery (183-185).”
  • Women with GDM are at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes in subsequent years.

    “It has been well documented and generally accepted that women found to have GDM are at high risk for development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in subsequent years.1,8,9”

    From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Women with gestational diabetes are at considerably increased risk of developing diabetes later in life.

    “because women with GDM are at a considerably increased risk of developing diabetes later (179)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. O'Sullivan J: Quarter century of glucose intolerance: incidence of diabetes mellitus by USPHS, NIH, WHO criteria. In Ad- vances in Diabetes Epidemiology. Eschwege E, Ed. New York, Elsevier, 1982, p. 123- 131

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, C., Newton, K. M., & Knopp, R. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1862-1868
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2021441410
Cited by
2,276
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 205 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 101 · 2012: 110
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, cumulative incidence, risk factors, fasting blood glucose, ethnic differences, racial disparities, follow-up duration, cohort retention
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Time Factors, Incidence, Diabetes, Gestational, Delivery, Obstetric, PubMed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review