Cited by 183Healthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsElectronic Health Records Systems

Systematic Review of Physiologic Monitor Alarm Characteristics and Pragmatic Interventions to Reduce Alarm Frequency

Open access
Paine, Christine Weirich, Goel, Veena V., Ely, Elizabeth, Stave, Christopher D., Stemler, Shannon, Zander, Miriam, Bonafide, Christopher P.·2016·Journal of Hospital Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alarm fatigue from frequent nonactionable physiologic monitor alarms is frequently named as a threat to patient safety. PURPOSE: To critically examine the available literature relevant to alarm fatigue. DATA SOURCES: Articles published in English, Spanish, or French between January 1980 and April 2015 indexed in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. STUDY SELECTION: Articles focused on hospital physiologic monitor alarms addressing any of the following: (1) the proportion of alarms that are actionable, (2) the relationship between alarm exposure and nurse response time, and (3) the effectiveness of interventions in reducing alarm frequency. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted data on setting, collection methods, proportion of alarms determined to be actionable, nurse response time, and associations between interventions and alarm rates. DATA SYNTHESIS: Our search produced 24 observational studies focused on alarm characteristics and response time and 8 studies evaluating interventions. Actionable alarm proportion ranged from <1% to 36% across a range of hospital settings. Two studies showed relationships between high alarm exposure and longer nurse response time. Most intervention studies included multiple components implemented simultaneously. Although studies varied widely, and many had high risk of bias, promising but still unproven interventions include widening alarm parameters, instituting alarm delays, and using disposable electrocardiographic wires or frequently changed electrocardiographic electrodes. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic monitor alarms are commonly nonactionable, and evidence supporting the concept of alarm fatigue is emerging. Several interventions have the potential to reduce alarms safely, but more rigorously designed studies with attention to possible unintended consequences are needed. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:136–144. © 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jhm.2520

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paine, C. W., Goel, V. V., Ely, E., Stave, C. D., Stemler, S., Zander, M., & Bonafide, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Hospital Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-14
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
136-144
ISSN
  • 1553-5592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-5606
OpenAlex
W2190577106
Cited by
183
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hospital Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Society of Hospital Medicine Student Hospitalist Scholar Grant
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (K23HL116427)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
alarm fatigue, nurse response time, patient safety, hospital monitoring systems
MeSH terms
Electrocardiography, Hospitals, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Time Factors, Clinical Alarms, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review