The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low‐field MRI: An MR physics perspective
Open accessAbstract
Historically, clinical MRI started with main magnetic field strengths in the ∼0.05–0.35T range. In the past 40 years there have been considerable developments in MRI hardware, with one of the primary ones being the trend to higher magnetic fields. While resulting in large improvements in data quality and diagnostic value, such developments have meant that conventional systems at 1.5 and 3T remain relatively expensive pieces of medical imaging equipment, and are out of the financial reach for much of the world. In this review we describe the current state‐of‐the‐art of low‐field systems (defined as 0.25–1T), both with respect to its low cost, low foot‐print, and subject accessibility. Furthermore, we discuss how low field could potentially benefit from many of the developments that have occurred in higher‐field MRI. In the first section, the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) dependence on the static magnetic field and its impact on the achievable contrast, resolution, and acquisition times are discussed from a theoretical perspective. In the second section, developments in hardware (eg, magnet, gradient, and RF coils) used both in experimental low‐field scanners and also those that are currently in the market are reviewed. In the final section the potential roles of new acquisition readouts, motion tracking, and image reconstruction strategies, currently being developed primarily at higher fields, are presented. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
SQUID-detected ultra-low field MRI
Espy, M. A., Matlashov, A. N., & Volegov, P. L. (2013) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.009 · Cited by 60
RetractedSparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging
Lustig, M., Donoho, D., & Pauly, J. M. (2007) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 · Cited by 6,952
SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI
Pruessmann, K. P., Weiger, M., Scheidegger, M. B., & Boesiger, P. (1999) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199911)42:5<952::aid-mrm16>3.0.co;2-s · Cited by 6,251
Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA)
Griswold, M. A., Jakob, P. M., Heidemann, R. M., Nittka, M., Jellus, V., Wang, J., Kiefer, B., & Haase, A. (2002) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.10171 · Cited by 5,303
The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods
Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., Fox, N. C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P. J., L. Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21049 · Cited by 4,347
Roemer, P. B., Edelstein, W. A., Hayes, C. E., Souza, S. P., & Mueller, O. M. (1990) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910160203 · Cited by 2,322
RARE imaging: A fast imaging method for clinical MR
Hennig, J., Nauerth, A., & Friedburg, H. (1986) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910030602 · Cited by 2,081
Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning
Zhu, B., Liu, J. Z., Cauley, S. F., Rosen, B. R., & Rosen, M. S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25988 · Cited by 1,694
Rohrer, M., Bauer, H., Mintorovitch, J., Requardt, M., & Weinmann, H.-J. (2005) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000184756.66360.d3 · Cited by 1,682
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting
Ma, D., Gulani, V., Seiberlich, N., Liu, K., Sunshine, J. L., Duerk, J. L., & Griswold, M. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11971 · Cited by 1,577
Cited by
Top-Level Design and Simulated Performance of the First Portable CT-MR Scanner
Peng, Y., Li, M., Grandinetti, J., Wang, G., & Jia, X. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3208278 · Cited by 4
“The medical relevance of ultra-low-field MRI has recently been demonstrated in several examples [9]–[12].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Marques, J. P., Simonis, F. F. J., & Webb, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-13
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1528-1542
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2911060328
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 19.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low‐field MRI: An MR physics perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.26637
- The paper
- Marques, J. P., Simonis, F. F. J., & Webb, A. G. (2019). Low‐field MRI: An MR physics perspective. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.