The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Voluntary employee turnover: combining variables from the ‘traditional’ turnover literature with the theory of planned behavior
Abstract
In this study we tried to answer the question of whether the three predictors from the theory of planned behavior provide a satisfactory explanation for intentions and behaviors in the context of voluntary employee turnover. We examined whether variables which have traditionally played a prominent role in the study of turnover, i.e., job satisfaction, organizational commitment, age, and tenure, were capable of explaining additional variance in turnover intentions and voluntary turnover. We conducted a longitudinal study in which 296 respondents serving as professionals in the Royal Netherlands Navy completed a questionnaire. Half a year later they were asked to answer a second identical questionnaire; data were obtained from 202 participants who answered all relevant questions in both questionnaires. Their actual behavior (staying versus leaving) was registered during a 2‐year period following the completion of the first questionnaire. Behavioral intentions proved to be the best predictor of turnover in which the effects of all other variables were accounted for. Job satisfaction and tenure explained a significant proportion of the variance in intentions after the effects of the predictors from the theory of planned behavior had been taken into account. The results are discussed in relation to theoretical, methodological, and practical issues. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
JOB SEARCH BEHAVIOR OF EMPLOYED MANAGERS
BRETZ, R. D., BOUDREAU, J. W., & JUDGE, T. A. (1994) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01725.x · Cited by 297
Cited by
Mor Barak, M. E., Lizano, E. L., Kim, A., Duan, L., Rhee, M.-K., Hsiao, H.-Y., & Brimhall, K. C. (2016) · Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance · doi:10.1080/23303131.2016.1138915 · Cited by 336
Lambert, E., & Hogan, N. (2009) · Criminal Justice Review · doi:10.1177/0734016808324230 · Cited by 306
Stereotype threat among older employees: relationship with job attitudes and turnover intentions
von Hippel, C., Kalokerinos, E. K., & Henry, J. D. (2013) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0029825 · Cited by 182
von Hippel, W., Brener, L., & von Hippel, C. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02037.x · Cited by 93
Retention of tech employees in India: lessons from the extant literature
Haque, F. (2024) · The Learning Organization · doi:10.1108/tlo-03-2023-0050 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- van Breukelen, W., van der Vlist, R., & Steensma, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09-28
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 893-914
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2022395324
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 18.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.