The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond top‐down and bottom‐up work redesign: Customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals
Abstract
Two established approaches to work redesign are formal top‐down interventions and proactive bottom‐up job crafting. Top‐down approaches are limited in their ability to create individually optimized work characteristics, whereas bottom‐up processes are constrained by the latitude workers have to modify their own jobs. Following recent research on the idiosyncratic deals (i‐deals) individuals negotiate with their employer, task i‐deals customizing job content are suggested as a third approach to work redesign. Hypotheses on antecedents and consequences of task i‐deals were tested in two studies conducted in the United States and Germany using structural equation modeling. LMX related positively to the extent of successfully negotiated task i‐deals, which, in turn, was associated with a more positive evaluation of work characteristics—specifically, higher complexity and control and lower stressors. Work characteristics mediated positive indirect effects of task i‐deals on employee initiative and work engagement. Denied requests for task i‐deals were associated with a more negative assessment of work characteristics. We conclude with theoretical, practical, and research implications for better understanding and implementing work redesign through i‐deals. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 · Cited by 13,643
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.248 · Cited by 9,297
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 · Cited by 5,688
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020
Cited by
Development and validation of the job crafting scale
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009 · Cited by 2,060
Latent burnout profiles: A new approach to understanding the burnout experience
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2016) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2016.09.001 · Cited by 655
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532
Individual job redesign: job crafting interventions in Healthcare
Gordon, H. J., Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Bipp, T., & Verhagen, M. A. M. T. (2018) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.002 · Cited by 323
Effectiveness of job crafting interventions: a meta-analysis and utility analysis
Oprea, B. T., Barzin, L., Vîrgă, D., Iliescu, D., & Rusu, A. (2019) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1646728 · Cited by 193
Bal, P. M., & Dorenbosch, L. (2015) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12058 · Cited by 77
Müller, A., De Lange, A., Weigl, M., Oxfart, C., & Van der Heijden, B. (2013) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.03.002 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., Glaser, J., Angerer, P., & Weigl, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 187-215
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2097427338
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 31.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
