The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research
Open accessAbstract
This summary commentary explores the likely future directions of research and theory on the design of organizational work. We give special attention to the social aspects of contemporary work, the process by which jobholders craft their own jobs, the changing contexts within which work is performed, and the increasing prominence of work that is performed by teams rather than individuals. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Self-citationTrist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 · Cited by 2,994
Proactive Behavior in Organizations
Crant, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600304 · Cited by 2,701
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
The Principles of Sociotechnical Design
Cherns, A. (1976) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872677602900806 · Cited by 1,063
Berg, J. M., Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.645 · Cited by 890
Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317901167460 · Cited by 617 · cited 1×
“…and skill, the social dimensions of work are likely to take on the status of core characteristics and, perhaps, give rise to an entirely new theoretical perspective that is distinct from that offered by JCT and other existing frameworks (e.g., Campion & Thayer, 1985; Parker, Wall, & Cordery, 2001).”
BackgroundErez, M. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.651 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Development and validation of the job crafting scale
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009 · Cited by 2,060
The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being.
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032141 · Cited by 1,027
Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement
Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1783 · Cited by 1,026
Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control
Möhlmann, M., Zalmanson, L., Henfridsson, O., & Gregory, R. W. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15333 · Cited by 554
Schwarzmüller, T., Brosi, P., Duman, D., & Welpe, I. M. (2018) · management revu · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2018-2-114 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 463-479
- ISSN
- 0894-3796 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1379
- OpenAlex
- W2031220560
- Cited by
- 906
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 64.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
