Cited by 1,027

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being.

Tims, Maria, Bakker, Arnold B., Derks, Daantje·2013·Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032141

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a three-wave study among employees working at a chemical plant, job crafting resulted in an increase in various job resources over time, such as skill variety, opportunities for development, and social support.

    “in a three-wave study among employees working at a chemical plant, Tims et al. (2013) showed that job crafting resulted in an increase in various job resources over time, such as skill variety, opportunities for development, and social support.”
  • Job resources predicted increased work engagement and job satisfaction.

    “These job resources, in turn, predicted increased work engagement and job satisfaction.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D.
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Published
2013-04
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
230-240
ISSN
  • 1939-1307
  • 1076-8998
Cited by
1,027
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review