Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Creatine supplementation for optimization of physical function in the patient at risk of functional disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Davies, Thomas W., Watson, Naomi, Pilkington, James J., McClelland, Thomas J., Azzopardi, Giada, Pearse, Rupert M., Prowle, John, Puthucheary, Zudin·2024·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of creatine replacement through supplementation for the optimization of physical function in the population at risk of functional disability is unclear. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from inception to November 2022. Studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing creatine supplementation with placebos in older adults and adults with chronic disease. The primary outcome was physical function measured by the sit‐to‐stand test after pooling data using random‐effects modeling. We also performed a Bayesian meta‐analysis to describe the treatment effect in probability terms. Secondary outcomes included other measures of physical function, muscle function, and body composition. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool. Results: We identified 33 RCTs, comprising 1076 participants. From six trials reporting the primary outcome, the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) was 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01–1.00; I 2 = 62%; P = 0.04); using weakly informative priors, the posterior probability that creatine supplementation improves physical function was 66.7%. Upper‐body muscle strength (SMD: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.06–0.44; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.01), handgrip strength (SMD 0.23; 95% CI: 0.01–0.45; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.04), and lean tissue mass (MD 1.08 kg; 95% CI: 0.77–1.38; I 2 = 26%; P < 0.01) improved with creatine supplementation. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was low or very low because of a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Creatine supplementation improves sit‐to‐stand performance, muscle function, and lean tissue mass. It is crucial to conduct high‐quality prospective RCTs to confirm these hypotheses (PROSPERO number, CRD42023354929).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jpen.2607

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

4 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1590/S0102-311X2009001500011 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/gerona/glv128 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/ageing/afx201 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.11.011 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/ageing/afw044 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1001/jama.2013.278481 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mijnarends DM Luiking YC Halfens RJG et al. Muscle health and costs: a glance at their relationship.J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(7):766‐773. · DOI
  9. Cruz‐JentoftAJ BahatG BauerJ et al.Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.Age Ageing.2019;48(1):16‐31.
  10. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211073 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.06.024 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/acel.13135 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0501559102 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111207 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/fsn3.2543 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00228-X · DOI
  17. 10.1017/S0029665111000036 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00726-016-2267-3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.232 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1995.tb09988.x · DOI
  21. Faager G, 2006, Creatine supplementation and physical training in patients with COPD: a double blind, placebo‐controlled study, Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 1, 445
  22. 10.1016/S0008-6363(95)00062-3 · DOI
  23. 10.3109/0284186X.2012.741325 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/nu13061912 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1186/s13054-022-04113-x · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/s00038-013-0504-z · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1007/s40265-013-0041-3 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760 · DOI
  31. 10.5334/jopd.33 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s00421-012-2514-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.3390/nu13010149 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.exger.2014.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1177/1545968306293449 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/acr.22747 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1164/rccm.200710-1508OC · DOI
  38. 10.1136/thx.2004.030452 · DOI
  39. 10.1139/apnm-2019-0066 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s12603-009-0124-8 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1139/apnm-2014-0498 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1002/jcsm.12094 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1998.00427.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004605 · DOI
  45. 10.5812/asjsm.36793 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.014 · DOI
  47. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00891.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1097/00005768-200203000-00023 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/jpen.1707 · DOI
  50. 10.1055/s-2000-8859 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176946 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1007/BF03325239 · DOI
  54. 10.1186/s13054-022-04048-3 · DOI
  55. 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000621 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/s12020-013-0070-4 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/gerona/60.2.148 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Rawson ES, 2003, Effects of creatine supplementation and resistance training on muscle strength and weightlifting performance, J Strength Cond Res, 17, 822
  59. Age UK. 1 in 4 (1.4 M) aged 60+ have been eating less since the start of the pandemic. Accessed June 20 2023.https://www.ageuk.org.uk/latest-press/articles/2021/1-in-10-1.4-million-aged-60-have-been-eating-less-since-the-start-of-the-pandemic/
  60. 10.1172/jci.insight.95581 · DOI

Cited by

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Davies, T. W., Watson, N., Pilkington, J. J., McClelland, T. J., Azzopardi, G., Pearse, R. M., Prowle, J., & Puthucheary, Z.
Affiliations
  • William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine &amp; Dentistry Queen Mary University of London London UK
  • Centre for Bioscience Manchester Metropolitan University John Dalton Building Manchester UK
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-02-28
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
389-405
ISSN
  • 0148-6071
  • 1941-2444
Cited by
18
References
30
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.