Cited by 272Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle activation and electromyography studiesMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Differences in size, strength, and power of upper and lower body muscle groups in young and older men

Candow, D. G., Chilibeck, P. D.·2005·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

We compared muscle thickness, torque, normalized torque (torque/muscle thickness), and power at 1.05 rad/s and 3.14 rad/s in flexor and extensor muscles of the elbow and knee, and in ankle plantar flexors in young (n=22, 18-31 years) and older (n=28, 59-76 years) men. Young men had greater muscle thickness for all muscle groups (p<.01), except elbow extensors, which were similar to older men. Young men had greater torque and power at both velocities for all muscle groups (p<.01), and greater normalized torque at both velocities for the elbow extensors and knee flexors and at the fast velocity for knee extensors. Relative to young mean values, muscle thickness, and torque, normalized torque, and power in the older group were most affected for lower-body measurements, especially at the fast velocity. Torque, normalized torque, and power (especially at fast velocities), and muscle thickness in the lower body are affected more by aging than are upper body measures in men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/60.2.148

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ageing brings a progressive decline in muscle mass, strength, and quality, along with an increase in fat mass.

    “Ageing is accompanied by major changes in body composition that can negatively affect functional status in older adults, including a progressive decrease in muscle mass, strength, and quality, accompanied by an increase in fat mass.1,2”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Candow, D. G., & Chilibeck, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Candow, D. G.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
148-156
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2147758671
Cited by
272
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Saskatchewan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
muscle thickness, muscle strength, muscle power, aging, upper body, lower body, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, knee flexors, knee extensors, ankle plantar flexors, torque, older men
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Elbow, Humans, Knee, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review