The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced preservation methods and nutrient retention in fruits and vegetables
Abstract
Despite the recommendations of international health organizations and scientific research carried out around the world, consumers do not take in sufficient quantities of healthy fruit and vegetable products. The use of new, ‘advanced’ preservation methods creates a unique opportunity for food manufacturers to retain nutrient content similar to that found in fresh fruits and vegetables. This review presents a summary of the published literature regarding the potential of high‐pressure and microwave preservation, the most studied of the ‘advanced’ processes, to retain the natural vitamin A, B, C, phenolic, mineral and fiber content in fruits and vegetables at the time of harvest. Comparisons are made with more traditional preservation methods that utilize thermal processing. Case studies on specific commodities which have received the most attention are highlighted; these include apples, carrots, oranges, tomatoes and spinach. In addition to summarizing the literature, the review includes a discussion of postharvest losses in general and factors affecting nutrient losses in fruits and vegetables. Recommendations are made for future research required to evaluate these advanced process methods. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qin, Y., Xia, M., Ma, J., Hao, Y., Liu, J., Mou, H., Cao, L., & Ling, W. (2009) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27814 · Cited by 443
Wojdyło, A., Figiel, A., & Oszmiański, J. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf802507j · Cited by 378
Cho, E. (2004) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.122.6.883 · Cited by 266
Crowe, F. L., Roddam, A. W., Key, T. J., Appleby, P. N., Overvad, K., Jakobsen, M. U., Tjonneland, A., Hansen, L., Boeing, H., Weikert, C., et al. (2011) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq465 · Cited by 263
Rickman, J. C., Bruhn, C. M., & Barrett, D. M. (2007) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2824 · Cited by 252
Self-citation
Cited by
Gao, Q.-H., Wu, C.-S., & Wang, M. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf4007032 · Cited by 561
Mehta, D., & Yadav, S. K. (2020) · Food Science and Technology International · doi:10.1177/1082013219865360 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrett, D. M., & Lloyd, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-11-18
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-22
- ISSN
- 0022-5142 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0010
- OpenAlex
- W2156807812
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.