The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Makes a Human Brand Authentic? Identifying the Antecedents of Celebrity Authenticity
Abstract
While authenticity has received considerable attention in the marketing literature, the factors that influence the perceived authenticity of a celebrity's “human brand” have remained unexplored. This research fills this void by identifying the antecedents of celebrity authenticity, defined as the perception that a celebrity behaves according to his or her true self. Based on a qualitative analysis of an open‐ended survey completed by 218 adults and on previous authenticity literature and attribution theory, the authors propose two antecedents of celebrity authenticity—rarity and stability—that are each composed of three sub‐dimensions. Analyses of cross‐sectional survey data from a sample of 428 adults provide support for the hypotheses that stability and rarity positively influence celebrity authenticity. Additionally, based on aging stability theory, the authors predict and demonstrate that the effects of rarity and stability on celebrity authenticity are moderated by age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Personality Development: Stability and Change
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913 · Cited by 2,699
A Multicomponent Conceptualization of Authenticity: Theory and Research
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38006-9 · Cited by 1,244
The true self and psychological health: emerging evidence and future directions
Schlegel, R. J., & Hicks, J. A. (2011) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00401.x · Cited by 148
Cited by
Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation
Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008 · Cited by 1,452
Leung, F. F., Gu, F. F., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-021-00829-4 · Cited by 580
Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of replika
Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600 · Cited by 522
What makes followers loyal? The role of influencer interactivity in building influencer brand equity
Jun, S., & Yi, J. (2020) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-02-2019-2280 · Cited by 340
Taillon, B. J., Mueller, S. M., Kowalczyk, C. M., & Jones, D. N. (2020) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-03-2019-2292 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulard, J. G., Garrity, C. P., & Rice, D. H.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-14
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-186
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W1507994783
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 23.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Makes a Human Brand Authentic? Identifying the Antecedents of Celebrity Authenticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mar.20771
- The paper
- Moulard, J. G., Garrity, C. P., & Rice, D. H. (2015). What Makes a Human Brand Authentic? Identifying the Antecedents of Celebrity Authenticity. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.