The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One is the loneliest number two can be as bad as one. The influence of AI Friendship Apps on users' well-being and addiction
Abstract
Although technology advancements provide opportunities for social interactions, reports show that people have never felt so alone and are increasingly adopting AI friendship and therapy‐related well‐being apps. By adopting a mixed‐method approach (i.e., netnography and quantitative survey), we investigate the extent AI friendship apps enhance users' well‐being—and to what extent they further exacerbate issues of using technology for social needs. Findings show that users of AI friendship apps report well‐being benefits from the relationship with the AI friend and, at the same time, find themselves being addicted to using the app. Specifically, we show that users' loneliness and fear of judgment, together with AI sentience and perceived well‐being gained, increase addiction to the app, while AI ubiquity and warmth reduce it. Taken together, the results show that despite the intended positive purpose of the apps, the negative effects that AI friendship apps have on well‐being may be much greater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High levels of social well-being are associated with positive mental health outcomes, including lower loneliness, greater life satisfaction, and increased emotional stability.
“High levels of social well-being are associated with positive mental health outcomes, including lower loneliness, greater life satisfaction, and increased emotional stability (Marriott and Pitardi, 2024).”
From I love you, my AI companion! Do you? Perspectives from the Triangular Theory of Love and Attachment Theory (2026) · cites this paper as Marriott and Pitardi, 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276 · Cited by 12,910
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, people can form relationships with such machines, especially when they display highly humanlike features (Nass & Moon, 2000).”
BackgroundFitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7785 · Cited by 2,730 · cited 3×
“A few studies in the medical field offer some initial insights into the use of therapy ‐ related apps (e.g., Woebot) and show that conversations with AI agents help reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety in the patients (Fitzpatrick et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialMende, M., Scott, M. L., van Doorn, J., Grewal, D., & Shanks, I. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243718822827 · Cited by 1,197
Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007 · Cited by 941 · cited 4×
“Sentience is defined as a nonhuman entity showing the ability to have a subjective experience and to perceive and feel things (Gibert & Martin, 2022; Gray & Wegner, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialMy Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships
Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102601 · Cited by 797 · cited 7×
“Finally, our results show that overall relationship with AI friends is the only driver of well ‐ being gained from using the app, confirming a body of literature supporting social attachments with social apps (e.g., Pentina et al., 2023; Skjuve et al., 2021; Ta et al., 2020).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUser Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis
Ta, V., Griffith, C., Boatfield, C., Wang, X., Civitello, M., Bader, H., DeCero, E., & Loggarakis, A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16235 · Cited by 561
Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of replika
Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107600 · Cited by 522
Croes, E. A. J., & Antheunis, M. L. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407520959463 · Cited by 291 · cited 3×
“However, in contrast to social media interactions, where people communicate through digital technologies, interactions with AI friends is a form of human – machine communication where individuals interact with a machine rather than through it (Croes & Antheunis, 2021).”
BackgroundDarcy, A., Daniels, J., Salinger, D., Wicks, P., & Robinson, A. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/27868 · Cited by 260
Do you mind if I ask you a personal question? How AI service agents alter consumer self-disclosure
Kim, T. W., Jiang, L., Duhachek, A., Lee, H., & Garvey, A. (2022) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705221120232 · Cited by 177
Exploring the mechanism of social media addiction: an empirical study from WeChat users
Cao, X., Gong, M., Yu, L., & Dai, B. (2020) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-08-2019-0347 · Cited by 158
Excessive dependence on mobile social apps: A rational addiction perspective
Kwon, H. E., So, H., Han, S. P., & Oh, W. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0658 · Cited by 156
Kayis, A. R., Satici, B., Deniz, M. E., Satici, S. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2022) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.1933181 · Cited by 104 · cited 5×
“For instance, loneliness is associated with higher levels of reliance on smartphones (Kayis et al., 2022) or dating apps (Coduto et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.007 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224377701400320 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/hcr/hqac008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1094670511411703 · DOI
- Bryman A., 2007, Business research method
- 10.1177/1094670520978798 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0265407519861153 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11747-010-0204-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/mar.21333 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.im.2018.07.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/ijcs.12574 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00146-021-01179-z · DOI
- Hair J. F., 2010, Multivariate data analysis 7th pearson prentice hall
- 10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0214 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11747-022-00862-x · DOI
- 10.1155/2020/2036842 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107126 · DOI · Paper page
- John O. P., 1999, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 102
- 10.2307/2787065 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mar.21786 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11747-021-00832-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935 · DOI
- 10.1002/mar.21584 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.067 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mar.21457 · DOI
- 10.1108/JOSM-12-2020-0435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102610 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1108/IMDS-09-2018-0415 · DOI
- 10.1002/mar.21339 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104309 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613659 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8551.12415 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Companions Reduce Loneliness
De Freitas, J., Oğuz-Uğuralp, Z., Uğuralp, A. K., & Puntoni, S. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaf040 · Cited by 165
Can Generative AI Chatbots Emulate Human Connection? A Relationship Science Perspective
Smith, M. G., Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916251351306 · Cited by 88
AI Companions Reduce Loneliness
De Freitas, J., Uğuralp, A. K., Uğuralp, Z., & Puntoni, S. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4893097 · Cited by 80
Hanson, K. R., & Bolthouse, H. (2024) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231241259627 · Cited by 42
Ng, P. M. L., Wan, C., Lee, D., Garnelo-Gomez, I., & Lau, M. M. (2026) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-11-2024-1783 · Cited by 27
Yuan, Y., Zhang, J., Aledavood, T., Zhang, R., & Saha, K. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790558 · Cited by 26
AI Companions Reduce Loneliness
De Freitas, J., Uguralp, A. K., Uguralp, Z. O., & Stefano, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.19096 · Cited by 12
A scoping review on the mental health harms of LLM-based chatbots
Diel, A., Torous, J., Cuijpers, P., Kleesiek, J., Nensa, F., Weber, N., Faust, F., Lalgi, T. J., Mellis, F. S., Teufel, M., et al. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-03054-x · Cited by 4
“…were low self-esteem (mediated by social anxiety, escapism, and chatbot fl ow) 112 , loneliness, fear of judgment, and perceived LLM-CB sentience 102,113 , media dependency 114 , depression (mediated by loneliness and moderated by mind perception) 115 , and social exclusion (mediated by social…”
Miller, V., Hill, M. J., & Moreira, T. (2026) · Communication and Change · doi:10.1007/s44382-026-00036-1 · Cited by 2
Untitled work
Eom, D., Renner, J., & Chinn, S. (2026) · arXiv (preprint)
Metadata
- Authors
- Marriott, H. R., & Pitardi, V.
- Affiliations
- Department of Marketing & Strategy, Cardiff Business School Cardiff University Cardiff UK
- Department of Marketing, Surrey Business School University of Surrey Surrey UK
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-09-18
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-101
- ISSN
- 0742-6046
- 1520-6793
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 16
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review