Cited by 146

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One is the loneliest number two can be as bad as one. The influence of AI Friendship Apps on users' well-being and addiction

Marriott, Hannah R., Pitardi, Valentina·2024·Psychology & Marketing

Abstract

Although technology advancements provide opportunities for social interactions, reports show that people have never felt so alone and are increasingly adopting AI friendship and therapy‐related well‐being apps. By adopting a mixed‐method approach (i.e., netnography and quantitative survey), we investigate the extent AI friendship apps enhance users' well‐being—and to what extent they further exacerbate issues of using technology for social needs. Findings show that users of AI friendship apps report well‐being benefits from the relationship with the AI friend and, at the same time, find themselves being addicted to using the app. Specifically, we show that users' loneliness and fear of judgment, together with AI sentience and perceived well‐being gained, increase addiction to the app, while AI ubiquity and warmth reduce it. Taken together, the results show that despite the intended positive purpose of the apps, the negative effects that AI friendship apps have on well‐being may be much greater.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mar.21899

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of social well-being are associated with positive mental health outcomes, including lower loneliness, greater life satisfaction, and increased emotional stability.

    “High levels of social well-being are associated with positive mental health outcomes, including lower loneliness, greater life satisfaction, and increased emotional stability (Marriott and Pitardi, 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.007 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/002224377701400320 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/hcr/hqac008 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1177/1094670511411703 · DOI
  5. Bryman A., 2007, Business research method
  6. 10.1177/1094670520978798 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1177/0265407519861153 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s11747-010-0204-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/mar.21333 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.im.2018.07.011 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/ijcs.12574 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.002 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s00146-021-01179-z · DOI
  14. Hair J. F., 2010, Multivariate data analysis 7th pearson prentice hall
  15. 10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0214 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s11747-022-00862-x · DOI
  17. 10.1155/2020/2036842 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107126 · DOI · Paper page
  19. John O. P., 1999, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 102
  20. 10.2307/2787065 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/mar.21786 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s11747-021-00832-9 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/mar.21584 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.067 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.036 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1002/mar.21457 · DOI
  28. 10.1108/JOSM-12-2020-0435 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102610 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.008 · DOI
  32. 10.1108/IMDS-09-2018-0415 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/mar.21339 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104309 · DOI
  35. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613659 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/1467-8551.12415 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marriott, H. R., & Pitardi, V.
Affiliations
  • Department of Marketing & Strategy, Cardiff Business School Cardiff University Cardiff UK
  • Department of Marketing, Surrey Business School University of Surrey Surrey UK
Venue
Psychology & Marketing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-18
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
86-101
ISSN
  • 0742-6046
  • 1520-6793
Cited by
146
References
16
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review