The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple mechanisms are involved in 6‐gingerol‐induced cell growth arrest and apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells
Open accessAbstract
6‐Gingerol, a natural product of ginger, has been known to possess anti‐tumorigenic and pro‐apoptotic activities. However, the mechanisms by which it prevents cancer are not well understood in human colorectal cancer. Cyclin D1 is a proto‐oncogene that is overexpressed in many cancers and plays a role in cell proliferation through activation by β‐catenin signaling. Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID)‐activated gene‐1 (NAG‐1) is a cytokine associated with pro‐apoptotic and anti‐tumorigenic properties. In the present study, we examined whether 6‐gingerol influences cyclin D1 and NAG‐1 expression and determined the mechanisms by which 6‐gingerol affects the growth of human colorectal cancer cells in vitro. 6‐Gingerol treatment suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis and G 1 cell cycle arrest. Subsequently, 6‐gingerol suppressed cyclin D1 expression and induced NAG‐1 expression. Cyclin D1 suppression was related to inhibition of β‐catenin translocation and cyclin D1 proteolysis. Furthermore, experiments using inhibitors and siRNA transfection confirm the involvement of the PKCε and glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)‐3β pathways in 6‐gingerol‐induced NAG‐1 expression. The results suggest that 6‐gingerol stimulates apoptosis through upregulation of NAG‐1 and G 1 cell cycle arrest through downregulation of cyclin D1. Multiple mechanisms appear to be involved in 6‐gingerol action, including protein degradation as well as β‐catenin, PKCε, and GSK‐3β pathways. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polakis, P. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.15.1837 · Cited by 3,183
Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals
Surh, Y.-J. (2003) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1189 · Cited by 2,955
Baek, S. J., Okazaki, R., Lee, S.-H., Martinez, J., Kim, J.-S., Yamaguchi, K., Mishina, Y., Martin, D. W., Shoieb, A., Mcentee, M. F., et al. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.015 · Cited by 175
Spinella, M. J., Freemantle, S. J., Sekula, D., Chang, J. H., Christie, A. J., & Dmitrovsky, E. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.31.22013 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Chemopreventive effects of natural dietary compounds on cancer development
Pan, M.-H., & Ho, C.-T. (2008) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b801558a · Cited by 346
Kim, H.-S., Lee, S.-H., Byun, Y., & Park, H.-D. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep08656 · Cited by 317
Self-citationBaek, S. J., & Eling, T. (2019) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.02.008 · Cited by 194
Self-citationGinger and its active compounds in cancer therapy: From folk uses to nano-therapeutic applications
Mahomoodally, M. F., Aumeeruddy, M. Z., Rengasamy, K. R. R., Roshan, S., Hammad, S., Pandohee, J., Hu, X., & Zengin, G. (2021) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.009 · Cited by 178
Ainehchi, N., Khaki, A., Ouladsahebmadarek, E., Hammadeh, M., Farzadi, L., Farshbaf-Khalili, A., Asnaashari, S., Khamnei, H., Khaki, A. A., & Shokoohi, M. (2020) · Archives of Medical Science · doi:10.5114/aoms.2020.93271 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S., Cekanova, M., & Baek, S. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-30
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-208
- ISSN
- 0899-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2744
- OpenAlex
- W2029286778
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.