Cited by 39Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesSurvey Methodology and NonresponseReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Reporting suicide attempts: consistency and its determinants in a large mental health study

Open access
Eikelenboom, Merijn, Smit, Johannes H., Beekman, Aartjan T. F., Kerkhof, Ad J. F. M., Penninx, Brenda W. J. H.·2014·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

A lifetime history (LTH) of suicide attempts (SAs) is frequently assessed in mental health surveys. However, little is known about the reliability of assessing a LTH of SA. This study examined the consistency and its determinants of reporting a LTH of SA in a large cohort of persons with a history of depression and/or anxiety. Data are from the baseline and two-year assessments of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. Persons with a Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)-based lifetime depressive and/or anxiety disorder (N = 1973) constitute the study sample. A LTH of SAs was assessed at baseline and at two-year follow-up. Of the persons who reported at either interview a LTH of SAs, more than one-third did not report this consistent at both interviews. Moreover, indications were found for more consistent reporting among persons with a higher number of SAs and among persons with current (severe) psychopathology as compared to those with remitted or less severe current psychopathology. Our results showed that even a salient topic as a history of SAs is prone for reporting errors, and that current psychological state influences reporting of a LTH of SAs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.1423

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eikelenboom, M., Smit, J. H., Beekman, A. T. F., Kerkhof, A. J. F. M., & Penninx, B. W. J. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-25
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
257-266
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W1946646253
Cited by
39
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
suicide attempts, reporting consistency, measurement reliability, depression, anxiety, psychopathology severity, remission, error reporting, NESDA
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychopathology, Suicide, Attempted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review