Cited by 28Resilience and Mental HealthPsychometric Methodologies and TestingOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Validation of the Resilience Scale for Adolescents (READ) in Ireland: a multi-group analysis: Validation of READ with Adolescents in Ireland

Open access
Kelly, Yvonne, Fitzgerald, Amanda, Dooley, Barbara·2017·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

(340) = 6146.02, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.056 (90% CI = 0.054-0.057), CFI = 0.97; GFI = 0.93. Measurement invariance indicated that the five-factor structure was similar across gender, school cycle and distress levels. Construct validity was evident, by correlating the five factors of the READ with various social, psychological and behavioural variables. The findings suggest that the READ is a valid measure to assess resilience factors among adolescents in Ireland, demonstrating its applicability in a different cultural context and with a wider age range of adolescents. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.1506

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hjemdal O., Friborg O., Martinussen M., Rosenvinge J.H. (2001) Preliminary results from the development and validation of a Norwegian scale for measuring adult resilience. Journal of the Norwegian Psychological Association, 38(4), 310–317. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D. (1981) LISREL V: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Method of Maximum Likelihood, Chicago, IL: National Educational Resources. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D. (2006a) LISREL 8 (version 8.8), Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jöreskog K.G., Sörbom D. (2006b) PRELIS 2 (version 2.8), Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lovibond S.H., Lovibond P.F. (1995) Manual for the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Syndromes, Sydney: Psychology Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  6. Luthar S.S. (2006) Resilience in development: A synthesis of research across five decades In Developmental Psychopathology: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation, pp. 740–795, New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, Y., Fitzgerald, A., & Dooley, B.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Fitzgerald, Amanda
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-29
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
e1506
ISSN
1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2344114287
Cited by
28
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
adolescent resilience, psychometric validation, measurement invariance, construct validity, gender differences, school cycles, psychological distress, cross-cultural adaptation, Ireland
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Culture, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Ireland, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Sex Characteristics, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics, Nonparametric, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review