Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of the dependence of blood R2 and R on oxygen saturation at 1.5 and 4.7 Tesla

Open access
Silvennoinen, M.J., Clingman, C.S., Golay, X., Kauppinen, R.A., van Zijl, P.C.M.·2003·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Gradient‐echo (GRE) blood oxygen level‐dependent (BOLD) effects have both intra‐ and extravascular contributions. To better understand the intravascular contribution in quantitative terms, the spin‐echo (SE) and GRE transverse relaxation rates, R2 and R, of isolated blood were measured as a function of oxygenation in a perfusion system. Over the normal oxygenation saturation range of blood between veins, capillaries, and arteries, the difference between these rates, R′2 = R − R2, ranged from 1.5 to 2.1 Hz at 1.5 T and from 26 to 36 Hz at 4.7 T. The blood data were used to calculate the expected intravascular BOLD effects for physiological oxygenation changes that are typical during visual activation. This modeling showed that intravascular Δ R is caused mainly by R2 relaxation changes, namely 85% and 78% at 1.5T and 4.7T, respectively. The simulations also show that at longer TEs (>70 ms), the intravascular contribution to the percentual BOLD change is smaller at high field than at low field, especially for GRE experiments. At shorter TE values, the opposite is the case. For pure parenchyma, the intravascular BOLD signal changes originate predominantly from venules for all TEs at low field and for short TEs at high field. At longer TEs at high field, the capillary contribution dominates. The possible influence of partial volume contributions with large vessels was also simulated, showing large (two‐ to threefold) increases in the total intravascular BOLD effect for both GRE and SE. Magn Reson Med 49:47–60, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.10355

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Silvennoinen, M. J., Clingman, C. S., Golay, X., Kauppinen, R. A., & van Zijl, P. C. M.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-31
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
47-60
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2074283724
Cited by
219
References
5
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the dependence of blood R2 and R on oxygen saturation at 1.5 and 4.7 Tesla. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.10355
The paper
Silvennoinen, M. J., Clingman, C. S., Golay, X., Kauppinen, R. A., & van Zijl, P. C. M. (2003). Comparison of the dependence of blood R2 and R on oxygen saturation at 1.5 and 4.7 Tesla. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10355

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.