The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady‐state sequences
Abstract
A detailed analysis is presented of a method to eliminate transverse magnetization prior to each rf excitation in pulse sequences with TR < T2. It is shown that artifact‐free images with high T1 contrast can be obtained only if a phase shift that is incremented during each TR interval is applied to the transverse magnetization. Computer simulations are used to show that when this phase increment is 117°, the steady‐state transverse magnetization prior to each rf pulse is nulled over a wide range of T1, T2, and rf tip angles, resulting in optimal T1, contrast. Such nulling of steady‐state transverse magnetization cannot be obtained by using large gradient pulses, or gradients of random or linearly incremented amplitude. Images of phantoms and human subjects confirm the theoretical predictions. © 1991 Academic Press, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FLASH imaging: Rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses
Haase, A., Frahm, J., Matthaei, D., Hänicke, W., & Merboldt, K.-D. (2011) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2011.09.021 · Cited by 1,153
FLASH imaging. Rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses
Haase, A., Frahm, J., Matthaei, D., Hanicke, W., & Merboldt, K.-D. (1986) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) · doi:10.1016/0022-2364(86)90433-6 · Cited by 826
Multiecho imaging sequences with low refocusing flip angles
Hennig, J. (1988) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) · doi:10.1016/0022-2364(88)90128-x · Cited by 403
Phase and intensity anomalies in fourier transform NMR
Freeman, R., & Hill, H. D. W. (1971) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) · doi:10.1016/0022-2364(71)90047-3 · Cited by 306
An analysis of fast imaging sequences with steady‐state transverse magnetization refocusing
Zur, Y., Stokar, S., & Bendel, P. (1988) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910060206 · Cited by 253
Self-citationEffects of Diffusion in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin-Echo Experiments
Woessner, D. E. (1961) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1731821 · Cited by 220
Signal, Noise, and Contrast in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Imaging
Edelstein, W. A., Bottomley, P. A., Hart, H. R., & Smith, L. S. (1983) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-198306000-00001 · Cited by 201
Diffusion and field-gradient effects in NMR Fourier spectroscopy
Kaiser, R. I., Bartholdi, E., & Ernst, R. R. (1974) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1681477 · Cited by 183
Motion‐insensitive, steady‐state free precession imaging
Zur, Y., Wood, M. L., & Neuringer, L. J. (1990) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910160311 · Cited by 173
Self-citation
Cited by
Bodurka, J., Ye, F., Petridou, N., Murphy, K., & Bandettini, P. A. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.039 · Cited by 158
Ercan, E., Varma, G., Mädler, B., Dimitrov, I. E., Pinho, M. C., Xi, Y., Wagner, B. C., Davenport, E. M., Maldjian, J. A., Alsop, D. C., et al. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.27211 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Zur, Y., Wood, M. L., & Neuringer, L. J.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-263
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2161458861
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady‐state sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910210210
- The paper
- Zur, Y., Wood, M. L., & Neuringer, L. J. (1991). Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady‐state sequences. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910210210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
