The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments
Open accessAbstract
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is a contrast mechanism that exploits exchange‐based magnetization transfer (MT) between solute and water protons. CEST effects compete with direct water saturation and conventional MT processes, and generally can only be quantified through an asymmetry analysis of the water saturation spectrum (Z‐spectrum) with respect to the water frequency, a process that is exquisitely sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities. Here it is shown that direct water saturation imaging allows measurement of the absolute water frequency in each voxel, allowing proper centering of Z‐spectra on a voxel‐by‐voxel basis independently of spatial B0 field variations. Optimal acquisition parameters for this “water saturation shift referencing” (WASSR) approach were estimated using Monte Carlo simulations and later confirmed experimentally. The optimal ratio of the WASSR sweep width to the linewidth of the direct saturation curve was found to be 3.3–4.0, requiring a sampling of 16–32 points. The frequency error was smaller than 1 Hz at signal‐to‐noise ratios of 40 or higher. The WASSR method was applied to study glycogen, where the chemical shift difference between the hydroxyl (OH) protons and bulk water protons at 3T is so small (0.75–1.25 ppm) that the CEST spectrum is inconclusive without proper referencing. Magn Reson Med, 2008. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Magnusson, I., Rothman, D. L., Katz, L. D., Shulman, R. G., & Shulman, G. I. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci115997 · Cited by 757
Cline, G. W., Petersen, K. F., Krssak, M., Shen, J., Hundal, R. S., Trajanoski, Z., Inzucchi, S., Dresner, A., Rothman, D. L., & Shulman, G. I. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199907223410404 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?
van Zijl, P. C. M., & Yadav, N. N. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22761 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citationvan Zijl, P. C. M., Lam, W. W., Xu, J., Knutsson, L., & Stanisz, G. J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.045 · Cited by 339
Self-citationNatural D ‐glucose as a biodegradable MRI contrast agent for detecting cancer
Chan, K. W. Y., McMahon, M. T., Kato, Y., Liu, G., Bulte, J. W. M., Bhujwalla, Z. M., Artemov, D., & van Zijl, P. C. M. (2012) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24520 · Cited by 337
Self-citationZaiss, M., & Bachert, P. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/r221 · Cited by 323
Jin, T., Wang, P., Zong, X., & Kim, S. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.24315 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, M., Gillen, J., Landman, B. A., Zhou, J., & van Zijl, P. C. M.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1441-1450
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2074136578
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.