Cited by 39Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research

High‐field MRI of single histological slices using an inductively coupled, self‐resonant microcoil: application to ex vivo samples of patients with Alzheimer's disease

Nabuurs, Rob J. A., Hegeman, Ingrid, Natté, Remco, van Duinen, Sjoerd G., van Buchem, Mark A., van der Weerd, Louise, Webb, Andrew G.·2011·NMR in Biomedicine

Abstract

A simple inductively coupled microcoil has been designed to image tissue samples placed on a microscope slide, samples which can subsequently be stained histologically. As the exact same tissue is used for MRI and histology, the two data sets can be compared without the need for complicated image registration techniques. The design can be integrated into any MRI system using existing commercial hardware. Compared with a commercial 25-mm-diameter birdcage, the signal-to-noise ratio was increased by a factor of 3.8, corresponding to an approximate 15-fold reduction in the data acquisition time. An example is shown of ex vivo samples from patients with Alzheimer's disease, in which the coregistration of highly sensitive iron staining and amyloid-β deposits is confirmed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nbm.1598

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRI scans of post-mortem human brains and a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease show decreases in hippocampal T2* MRI, which is sensitive to the magnetic properties of iron or its spatial variance, attributed in part to iron in Aβ plaques.

    “MRI scans of post-mortem human brains and a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease show decreases in hippocampal T2* MRI, which is sensitive to the magnetic properties of iron86,87 or its spatial variance, attributed in part to iron in Aβ plaques.88–90”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nabuurs, R. J. A., Hegeman, I., Natté, R., van Duinen, S. G., van Buchem, M. A., van der Weerd, L., & Webb, A. G.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Webb, Andrew G.
Venue
NMR in Biomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-19
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
351-357
ISSN
  • 0952-3480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1492
OpenAlex
W1969878863
Cited by
39
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NMR in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Keywords
microcoils, self-resonant coils, high-field MRI, ex vivo brain tissue, Alzheimer's disease, iron staining, amyloid-beta deposition, co-registration, signal-to-noise ratio, birdcage coil
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Calibration, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Radio Waves, Echo-Planar Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review