Cited by 82Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

High field magnetic resonance microscopy of the human hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease: quantitative imaging and correlation with iron

Open access
Antharam, Vijay, Collingwood, Joanna F., Bullivant, John-Paul, Davidson, Mark R., Chandra, Saurav, Mikhaylova, Albina, Finnegan, Mary E., Batich, Christopher +2 more·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

We report R(2) and R(2) in human hippocampus from five unfixed post-mortem Alzheimer's disease (AD) and three age-matched control cases. Formalin-fixed tissues from opposing hemispheres in a matched AD and control were included for comparison. Imaging was performed in a 600MHz (14T) vertical bore magnet at MR microscopy resolution to obtain R(2) and R(2) (62 μm×62 μm in-plane, 80 μm slice thickness), and R(1) at 250 μm isotropic resolution. R(1), R(2) and R(2) maps were computed for individual slices in each case, and used to compare subfields between AD and controls. The magnitudes of R(2) and R(2) changed very little between AD and control, but their variances in the Cornu Ammonis and dentate gyrus were significantly higher in AD compared for controls (p<0.001). To investigate the relationship between tissue iron and MRI parameters, each tissue block was cryosectioned at 30 μm in the imaging plane, and iron distribution was mapped using synchrotron microfocus X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. A positive correlation of R(2) and R(2)* with iron was demonstrated. While studies with fixed tissues are more straightforward to conduct, fixation can alter iron status in tissues, making measurement of unfixed tissue relevant. To our knowledge, these data represent an advance in quantitative imaging of hippocampal subfields in unfixed tissue, and the methods facilitate direct analysis of the relationship between MRI parameters and iron. The significantly increased variance in AD compared for controls warrants investigation at lower fields and in-vivo, to determine if this parameter is clinically relevant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.019

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRI scans of post-mortem human brains and a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease show decreases in hippocampal T2* MRI, which is sensitive to the magnetic properties of iron or its spatial variance, attributed in part to iron in Aβ plaques.

    “MRI scans of post-mortem human brains and a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease show decreases in hippocampal T2* MRI, which is sensitive to the magnetic properties of iron86,87 or its spatial variance, attributed in part to iron in Aβ plaques.88–90”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dawe RJ Bennett DA Schneider JA Vasireddi SK Arfanakis K 2009 Postmortem MRI of human brain hemispheres: T2 relaxation times during formaldehyde fixation Magn Reson Med 61 810 818 19189294 PMC2713761

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antharam, V., Collingwood, J. F., Bullivant, J.-P., Davidson, M. R., Chandra, S., Mikhaylova, A., Finnegan, M. E., Batich, C., Forder, J. R., & Dobson, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Collingwood, Joanna F.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
1249-1260
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091460820
Cited by
82
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (1R21NS060304-01, 1UL1RR029890)
  • EPSRC LSI Postdoctoral Fellowship (EP/D066654/1)
  • RCUK Academic Fellowship
  • Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, hippocampus, R2* mapping, R1 mapping, tissue iron, iron distribution, hippocampal subfields, cornu ammonis, dentate gyrus, unfixed tissue, postmortem brain, quantitative MRI
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cadaver, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Iron, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Microscopy, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Tissue Distribution, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review