Cited by 33Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsNeural dynamics and brain function

A succession of anesthetic endpoints in the Drosophila brain

van Swinderen, Bruno·2006·Journal of Neurobiology

Abstract

General anesthetics abolish behavioral responsiveness in all animals, and in humans this is accompanied by loss of consciousness. Whether similar target mechanisms and behavioral endpoints exist across species remains controversial, although model organisms have been successfully used to study mechanisms of anesthesia. In Drosophila, a number of key mutants have been characterized as hypersensitive or resistant to general anesthetics by behavioral assays. In order to investigate general anesthesia in the Drosophila brain, local field potential (LFP) recordings were made during incremental exposures to isoflurane in wild‐type and mutant flies. As in higher animals, general anesthesia in flies was found to involve a succession of distinct endpoints. At low doses, isoflurane uncoupled brain activity from ongoing movement, followed by a sudden attenuation in neural correlates of perception. Average LFP activity in the brain was more gradually attenuated with higher doses, followed by loss of movement behavior. Among mutants, a strong correspondence was found between behavioral and LFP sensitivities, thereby suggesting that LFP phenotypes are proximal to the anesthetic's mechanism of action. Finally, genetic and pharmacological analysis revealed that anesthetic sensitivities in the fly brain are, like other arousal states, influenced by dopaminergic activity. These results suggest that volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane may target the same processes that sustain wakefulness and attention in the brain. LFP correlates of general anesthesia in Drosophila provide a powerful new approach to uncovering the nature of these processes. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 66: 1195–1211, 2006

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/neu.20300

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drosophila exposed to isoflurane show uncoupling of neural activity from movement at lower doses and cessation of movement at higher doses correlated with local field potential characteristics.

    “Drosophila exposed to isoflurane demonstrate an uncoupling of neural activity patterns from movement at lower doses and cessation of movement at higher doses that correlate with local field potential characteristics [155].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [155]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Swinderen, B.
Venue
Journal of Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-20
Volume
66
Issue
11
Pages
1195-1211
ISSN
  • 0022-3034 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4695
OpenAlex
W2027025589
Cited by
33
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
general anesthesia, isoflurane, Drosophila brain, local field potentials, anesthetic sensitivity, dopaminergic activity, wakefulness, attention, loss of consciousness, neural correlates of perception, movement behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drosophila, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Isoflurane, Phenotype, Sleep, Anesthetics, General, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review