Cited by 106Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

A neomorphic syntaxin mutation blocks volatile-anesthetic action in Caenorhabditis elegans

Open access
van Swinderen, Bruno, Saifee, Owais, Shebester, Laynie, Roberson, Russell, Nonet, Michael L., Crowder, C. Michael·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms underlying general anesthesia are unknown. For volatile general anesthetics (VAs), indirect evidence for both lipid and protein targets has been found. However, no in vivo data have implicated clearly any particular lipid or protein in the control of sensitivity to clinical concentrations of VAs. Genetics provides one approach toward identifying these mechanisms, but genes strongly regulating sensitivity to clinical concentrations of VAs have not been identified. By screening existing mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , we found that a mutation in the neuronal syntaxin gene dominantly conferred resistance to the VAs isoflurane and halothane. By contrast, other mutations in syntaxin and in the syntaxin-binding proteins synaptobrevin and SNAP-25 produced VA hypersensitivity. The syntaxin allelic variation was striking, particularly for isoflurane, where a 33-fold range of sensitivities was seen. Both the resistant and hypersensitive mutations decrease synaptic transmission; thus, the indirect effect of reducing neurotransmission does not explain the VA resistance. As assessed by pharmacological criteria, halothane and isoflurane themselves reduced cholinergic transmission, and the presynaptic anesthetic effect was blocked by the resistant syntaxin mutation. A single gene mutation conferring high-level resistance to VAs is inconsistent with nonspecific membrane-perturbation theories of anesthesia. The genetic and pharmacological data suggest that the resistant syntaxin mutant directly blocks VA binding to or efficacy against presynaptic targets that mediate anesthetic behavioral effects. Syntaxin and syntaxin-binding proteins are candidate anesthetic targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2479

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No single gene mutation completely removes volatile anesthetic responsiveness.

    “no single gene mutation fully ablates volatile anesthetic responsiveness.”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Mutations that enhance presynaptic release cause volatile anesthetic resistance, while those that impair release cause hypersensitivity.

    “In general, mutations that enhanced presynaptic release led to volatile anesthetic resistance, whereas those that impaired release produced a hypersensitive phenotype [14].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

  • C. elegans with altered volatile anesthetic sensitivity have syntaxin mutations that can cause resistance or hypersensitivity depending on the allele.

    “Worms with altered sensitivity to volatile anesthetics were found to have mutations in syntaxin that could manifest either with resistance or hypersensitivity, depending on the mutated allele.”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Swinderen, B., Saifee, O., Shebester, L., Roberson, R., Nonet, M. L., & Crowder, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Anesthesiology, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, and Anatomy and Neurobiology, Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-03-02
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
2479-2484
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2111447389
Cited by
106
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm059781-08)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM-059781)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Keywords
volatile anesthetics, general anesthesia, syntaxin, neomorphic mutations, isoflurane, halothane, synaptobrevin, SNAP-25, synaptic transmission, cholinergic neurotransmission, anesthetic resistance, Caenorhabditis elegans
MeSH terms
Aldicarb, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Caenorhabditis, Crosses, Genetic, Genes, Dominant, Halothane, Isoflurane, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Synaptic Transmission, Phenotype, Regression Analysis, Disorders of Sex Development, Sequence Alignment, Synaptophysin, Genes, Helminth, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Qa-SNARE Proteins, Synaptosomal-Associated Protein 25

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review