Cited by 86Education Discipline and InequalitySchool Choice and PerformanceEarly Childhood Education and Development

The negative impacts of starting middle school in sixth grade

Cook, Philip J., MacCoun, Robert, Muschkin, Clara, Vigdor, Jacob·2008·Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Abstract

Using administrative data on public school students in North Carolina, we find that sixth grade students attending middle schools are much more likely to be cited for discipline problems than those attending elementary school. That difference remains after adjusting for the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the students and their schools. Furthermore, the higher infraction rates recorded by sixth graders who are placed in middle school persist at least through ninth grade. An analysis of end‐of‐grade test scores provides complementary findings. A plausible explanation is that sixth graders are at an especially impressionable age; in middle school, the exposure to older peers and the relative freedom from supervision have deleterious consequences. These findings are relevant to the current debate over the best school configuration for incorporating the middle grades. Based on our results, we suggest that there is a strong argument for separating sixth graders from older adolescents. © 2008 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pam.20309

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 6th-grade students quasi-randomly placed in middle schools experience significantly more exclusionary discipline than those quasi-randomly placed in elementary schools.

    “P.J. Cook et al. (2008) have found that 6th-grade students quasi-randomly placed in middle schools experience significantly more exclusionary discipline than those quasi-randomly placed in elementary schools.”

    From Fostering Belonging, Transforming Schools: The Impact of Restorative Practices (2023) · cites this paper as P.J. Cook et al. (2008)

  • Students who attend 6th grade in a middle school experience substantially more exclusionary discipline than similarly situated students who attend 6th grade in an elementary school.

    “P.J. Cook et al. (2008) have found that students who attend 6th grade in a middle school experience substantially more exclusionary discipline than similarly situated students who attend 6th grade in an elementary school.”

    From Fostering Belonging, Transforming Schools: The Impact of Restorative Practices (2023) · cites this paper as P.J. Cook et al. (2008)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, P. J., MacCoun, R., Muschkin, C., & Vigdor, J.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-04
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
104-121
ISSN
  • 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6688
OpenAlex
W2000913071
Cited by
86
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
19.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • William T. Grant Foundation
  • Spencer Foundation
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
junior high school, sixth grade, student discipline, elementary school, peer influence, adolescent development, public school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review