Cited by 55Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utilization of antidepressants in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based survey from 2000 to 2009

Abstract

Objective: This study examined trends in antidepressant utilization in Taiwan between 2000 and 2009. Methods: We collected data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of all incident antidepressant use. We described the incidence, prevalence, and therapeutic indications of antidepressant use. We tested the trends by using logistic regression analyses with adjustment for age and sex. Results: Overall, the prevalence of antidepressant use per 1000 persons increased from 32.1 in 2000 to 46.3 in 2009; however, the incidence per 1000 persons declined from 20.8 in 2000 to 16.5 in 2009. For antidepressant classes, the prescriptions of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other new agents increased during the study periods; however, the use of tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors declined. For therapeutic indications, we found increasing trends of antidepressant use for sleep and adjustment disorders; however, the rates of antidepressant use for mood disorder, anxiety disorders, and non‐psychiatric conditions decreased. Conclusions: Regarding the new use of antidepressants in Taiwan between 2000 and 2009, we found that the decreased incidence of antidepressant use might be attributed mainly to the decreased use of tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Decreased use among middle‐aged and older persons and fewer antidepressant prescriptions for non‐psychiatric conditions were also noted. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pds.3255

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1176/appi.ps.58.4.554 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/pds.1385 · DOI
  3. 10.1176/appi.ps.58.1.79 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/pds.1303 · DOI
  5. 10.2165/00023210-200822110-00005 · DOI
  6. 10.1176/ps.2009.60.5.611 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.jad.2006.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01511.x · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02178.x · DOI
  12. Drossman DA, 2006, New standard for functional gastrointestinal disorders, J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 15, 237
  13. Corcos J, 2006, Canadian Urological Association guidelines on urinary incontinence, Can J Urol, 13, 3127
  14. 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.06.019 · DOI
  15. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistic Methodology, 2009, Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment
  16. 10.1002/pds.1751 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb08581.x · DOI
  18. 10.1176/appi.ps.55.6.691 · DOI
  19. 10.1136/bmj.330.7488.396 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.46 · DOI
  21. 10.1001/archinte.164.21.2367 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0269881103174019 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.013 · DOI
  24. 10.2105/AJPH.94.4.562 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02780.x · DOI
  26. 10.2165/00002512-200219040-00004 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/S1092852900016965 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00890.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04358.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wu, C., Shau, W., Chan, H., Lee, Y., Lai, Y., & Lai, M.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Division of Health Technology Assessment Center for Drug Evaluation Taipei Taiwan
  • Chung Yuan Christian University (TW)
  • Cardinal Tien Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Lai, Mei‐Shu
Venue
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
980-988
ISSN
  • 1053-8569 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1557
OpenAlex
W1958976034
Cited by
55
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health Research Institutes
  • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antidepressant use, antidepressant prescribing trends, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, trazodone, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, Taiwan
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Mental Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Sleep Wake Disorders, Taiwan, Logistic Models, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review