The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of the Preserved Amino Acid Bias in Peptide Profiles of Iron Age Teeth from a Tropical Environment Enable Sexing of Individuals Using Amelogenin MRM
Abstract
The first dental proteomic profile of Iron Age individuals (ca. 2000–1000 years B.P.), collected from the site of Long Long Rak rock shelter in northwest Thailand is described. A bias toward the preservation of the positively charged aromatic, and polar amino acids is observed. It is evident that the 212 proteins identified (2 peptide, FDR <1%) comprise a palimpsest of alterations that occurred both ante‐mortem and post‐mortem. Conservation of amino acids within the taphonomically resistant crystalline matrix enabled the identification of both X and Y chromosome linked amelogenin peptides. A novel multiple reaction monitoring method using the sex specific amelogenin protein isoforms is described and indicate the teeth are of male origin. Functional analysis shows an enrichment of pathways associated with metabolic disorders and shows a capacity for harboring these conditions prior to death. Stable isotope analysis using carbon isotopes highlights the strongly C 3 based (≈80%) diet of the Long Long Rak cemetery people, which probably comprised rice combined with protein from freshwater fish among other food items. The combination of proteomics and stable isotope analysis provides a complementary strategy for assessing the demography, diet, lifestyle, and possible diseases experienced by ancient populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More sensitive MS techniques have enabled increased protein sequence coverage.
“More recently, more sensitive MS techniques have enabled increased protein sequence coverage”
From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [152]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says recent advances in high-throughput, high-resolution mass spectrometry have greatly improved sensitivity and accuracy. It does not say those advances increased protein sequence coverage; the Palaeoproteomics and ion-mapping passages describe peptide identification but do not establish that link. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains
Prüfer, K., Racimo, F., Patterson, N., Jay, F., Sankararaman, S., Sawyer, S., Heinze, A., Renaud, G., Sudmant, P. H., de Filippo, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12886 · Cited by 2,254
An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor
Fu, Q., Hajdinjak, M., Moldovan, O. T., Constantin, S., Mallick, S., Skoglund, P., Patterson, N., Rohland, N., Lazaridis, I., Nickel, B., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14558 · Cited by 802
Ancient gene flow from early modern humans into Eastern Neanderthals
Kuhlwilm, M., Gronau, I., Hubisz, M. J., de Filippo, C., Prado-Martinez, J., Kircher, M., Fu, Q., Burbano, H. A., Lalueza-Fox, C., de la Rasilla, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16544 · Cited by 577
A guide to ancient protein studies
Hendy, J., Welker, F., Demarchi, B., Speller, C., Warinner, C., & Collins, M. J. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x · Cited by 291
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- a)M.Slatkin F.Racimo Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.2016 113 6380; · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1506646112 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.17092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1249274 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/ddu309 · DOI
- 10.1002/elps.11501601185 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1714926115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1605834113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/srep23559 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rsos.161004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng.2906 · DOI · Paper page
- Mackie M., 2017, STAR, 1
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0041244 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rsta.2015.0373 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0180552 · DOI · Paper page
- Pumijumnong N., 2017, Teak Log Coffins in Northwest Thailand: Dated by Dendrochronology and 14C wiggle Matching
- Jágr M., 2012, Eur. J. Oral Sci., 259, 120
- Hill R. C., 2015, Mol. Cell Biol., 14, 1946
- 10.1021/pr200721u · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0141876 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/mcp.M600274-MCP200 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1138 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw936 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054 · DOI · Paper page
- J.Hintze inhttps://doi.org/www.ncss.com 2013.
- 10.1006/jasc.1996.0126 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.06.025 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa1230 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.013 · DOI
- 10.1353/asi.0.0017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.018 · DOI
- 10.1086/512987 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.72.8.2891 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ea.13.050185.001325 · DOI
- 10.1002/elps.201000027 · DOI
- Salido E. C., 1992, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 50, 303
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00216-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.06.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1177/0022034516662246 · DOI
- Cleland T. P., 2015, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 282, 20150015
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.061 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsob.160267 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034511 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ancient protein analysis in archaeology
Hendy, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb9314 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Wasinger, V. C., Curnoe, D., Bustamante, S., Mendoza, R., Shoocongdej, R., Adler, L., Baker, A., Chintakanon, K., Boel, C., & Tacon, P. S. C.
- Affiliations
- Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia
- Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives Research Centre University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia
- Department of Archaeology Silpakorn University Bangkok 10200 Thailand
- Interaction between Prehistoric Population and Environments in Highland Pang Mapha Project Bangkok 10170 Thailand
- PERAHU Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research & School of Humanities Languages and Social Science Griffith University Gold Coast campus QLD 4222 Australia
- Venue
- PROTEOMICS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-18
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1615-9853
- 1615-9861
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (LP120200144, FT120100168)
- Thailand Research Fund (RTA6080001, RDG55H0006)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review