Cited by 83Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Coping in long‐term survivors of childhood cancer: relations to psychological distress

Wenninger, Kerstin, Helmes, Almut, Bengel, Jürgen, Lauten, Melchior, Völkel, Susanne, Niemeyer, Charlotte M.·2013·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to describe coping strategies and their associations with psychological distress in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Methods: One hundred and sixty‐four childhood cancer survivors, at least 7 years after diagnosis, completed questionnaires assessing demographics, health information, psychological distress, and different ways of coping (return rate: 61%). The Brief Symptom Inventory‐18 (BSI‐18) and the Post‐traumatic Diagnostic Scale's (PDS) eight‐item short form were used to measure psychological distress. Coping was assessed with the Cognitive Control Strategies Scale (CCSS), the Illness Perception Questionnaire‐Revised (IPQ‐R), and the White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI). Results: Higher levels of distress were associated with the female sex, not being in a relationship, and with the presence of medical late effects. These predictors explained 12% of the variance in psychological distress. When coping variables were also entered into the equation, the amount of explained variance increased to 50%. The most important determinants of psychological distress in our sample were a tendency to suppress negative thoughts and a low level of optimism. Conclusion: These results contribute to a better understanding of the correlates of difficulties in long‐term psychological adjustment after childhood cancer. Cognitive strategies, which are associated with or may increase the risk for concurrent psychological distress, in specific, avoidance of negative thoughts and a lack of positive future expectations, should be addressed in psychological counseling with survivors suffering from symptoms of distress. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3073

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wenninger, K., Helmes, A., Bengel, J., Lauten, M., Völkel, S., & Niemeyer, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Wenninger, Kerstin
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-28
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
854-861
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2168233398
Cited by
83
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
childhood cancer survivors, psychological distress, coping strategies, optimism, illness perception, psychological adjustment, young adults, Brief Symptom Inventory
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Prevalence, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review