Cited by 152Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchFamily Support in Illness

A systematic review of spousal couple‐based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions

Li, Qiuping, Loke, Alice Yuen·2014·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: With the research focus on family caregiving shifting from the individual to the dyadic level, it is suggested that the caregiver‐patient dyad as a unit be the focus and direction of caregiving interventions for families coping with cancer. The objectives in conducting this review were to explore the existing interventions for spousal couples coping with cancer in terms of type of intervention, contents, approach, and outcome measurements; and to identify directions for the development of interventions. Methods: A systematic search of four databases was conducted to identify articles published in English or Chinese from the launch of the databases to March 2013. Studies were located using an electronic search, a manual search, and an author search. Results: A total of 17 articles were identified and included in this review. These interventions focused mainly on patient caregiving and caregiver self care, and usually lasted for 6 weeks using a face‐to‐face group mode, with follow‐up at around 3 months. The outcome measures can be grouped into three main dimensions: dyadic appraisal, dyadic coping, and dyadic adjustments. Positive outcomes were reported for these interventions, including improvements in communication, dyadic coping, the quality of life of both the patients and their partners, psychosocial distress, sexual functioning, and marital satisfaction. Conclusions: These findings highlighted the positive outcomes of couple‐based interventions that focus on couples coping with cancer. Future studies on couple‐based interventions should be conducted in different cultures, such as in Asian countries. Collaboration between researchers and clinicians is crucial to ensure the development of effective and accessible supportive interventions targeting couples coping with cancer. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3535

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some patient-caregiver dyad programs reported promising outcomes, and therefore, dyad intervention has been emphasized in the literature.

    “Some patient–caregiver dyad programs reported promising outcomes, and therefore, dyad intervention has been emphasized in the literature [37, 38].”
  • Systematic review shows that spousal interventions positively affect cancer care and improve patient and caregiver quality of life.

    “Systematic review shows that spousal interventions positively affect cancer care and help improve the patient's and caregiver's quality of life [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., & Loke, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Loke, Alice Yuen
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-10
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
731-739
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1949955657
Cited by
152
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
couple-based interventions, cancer, dyadic coping, dyadic adjustment, patient-caregiver dyads, family caregiving, marital satisfaction, communication, quality of life, sexual function, psychosocial distress, intervention development
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Spouses, Couples Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review