Cited by 74Cancer survivorship and careOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingPalliative and Oncologic Care

Life goals in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the literature

Open access
Hullmann, Stephanie E., Robb, Sheri L., Rand, Kevin L.·2016·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Purposes of this systematic review of life goal research in cancer patients were to (1) identify life goal characteristics and processes being examined, (2) describe instruments used to assess life goal constructs, (3) identify theoretical models being used to guide research, and (4) summarize what is known about the impact of the cancer experience on life goal characteristics, processes, and psychological outcomes. Methods: We conducted this systematic review using MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) published between 1993 and 2014, (2) English language, (3) cancer patient population, and (4) original research articles that assessed life goal characteristics and/or goal processes. One hundred ninety‐seven articles were screened and 27 included in the final review. Results: Seven life goal characteristics and seven life goal processes were identified, and less than half of studies investigated associations between goal characteristics and processes. Conceptual definitions were not provided for about half of the identified life goal constructs. Studies used both validated and author‐developed instruments to assess goal constructs. Twenty‐four different theoretical models were identified, with self‐regulation theory most frequently cited. Overall, the literature suggests that cancer impacts patients' life goal characteristics and processes, and life goal disturbance is related to poorer psychological outcomes. Conclusions: The impact of the cancer experience on life goals is an important and emerging area of research that would benefit from conceptual and theoretical clarity and measurement consistency. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3852

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Finding

    Seven life goal process constructs were identified: self-efficacy, effort, pursuit, attainment, disturbance, loss, and adjustment.

    “Seven different life goal process constructs were also identified: 1) self-efficacy, 2) effort, 3) pursuit, 4) attainment, 5) disturbance, 6) loss, and 7) adjustment.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    Studies used both validated and author-developed instruments to assess life goal constructs.

    “Studies used both validated and author-developed instruments to assess goal constructs.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    Seven life goal characteristics were identified: content, life domains, importance, attainability, difficulty, temporal range, and intrinsic/extrinsic.

    “We identified seven different life goal characteristics: 1) content, 2) life domains, 3) importance, 4) attainability, 5) difficulty, 6) temporal range, and 7) intrinsic/extrinsic.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    Most studies were guided by at least one theoretical model, and 24 different theoretical models were explicitly identified.

    “The majority of studies (n = 22) were guided by at least one theoretical model, but some (n = 5) did not specify a theoretical model, and several (n = 8) cited more than one (see Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    Life goal characteristics were assessed with validated questionnaires, author-developed questionnaires, and author-developed semi-structured interviews, while more than half of life goal processes were assessed using validated questionnaires.

    “Life goal characteristics were assessed using validated questionnaires (n = 7), author-developed questionnaires (n = 7), and author-developed, semi-structured interviews (n = 6).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young adult cancer survivors face physical, mental, social, educational, occupational, and financial consequences from cancer and its treatment.

    “their survivorship journey entails managing the physical and mental health, social, educational, occupational, and financial consequences of cancer diagnosis and treatment [2-6].”

    From A digital, coach-assisted intervention to address the psychosocial needs of young adult cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial protocol and intervention adaptation process (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Background describes treatment-related fatigue and pain interfering with survivors’ return to work and social activities. The Results and Conclusions report poorer psychological outcomes associated with disrupted life goals and greater goal disturbance in younger patients. The paper does not establish the educational or financial consequences attributed to it; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a pressing need for interventions addressing YA survivors' psychosocial concerns to enhance quality of life across the lifespan.

    “Given the increasing number of YA survivors [1] and the impacts of cancer across various aspects of life, particularly among YAs [2-6, 8], there is a pressing need for interventions addressing YA survivors’ psychosocial concerns in order to enhance quality of life across the lifespan [7].”

    From A digital, coach-assisted intervention to address the psychosocial needs of young adult cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial protocol and intervention adaptation process (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) say cancer disrupts younger adults’ life goals more than older adults’ and propose research to inform interventions that could improve patients’ life goals and psychological outcomes. The paper does not specifically call for urgent psychosocial interventions for young adult survivors or establish that such interventions enhance quality of life across the lifespan. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hope is associated with enhanced mental health and quality of life in cancer survivors.

    “and in cancer survivors [3, 16, 21-27]”

    From A digital, coach-assisted intervention to address the psychosocial needs of young adult cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial protocol and intervention adaptation process (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results and Conclusions discuss associations between life-goal pursuit and psychological outcomes in cancer patients, while the Background mentions quality of life in relation to treatment disruption. Searches for hope and quality of life found no passage linking hope to either mental health or quality of life in cancer survivors. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Young adult cancer survivors report more life goal disturbances than older cancer patients, and these disturbances are linked to negative psychological outcomes.

    “compared to older patients, young adult cancer survivors (YACS) report more life goal disturbances [2], which are related to negative psychological outcomes [2].”
  • This study highlights the potential utility of positive psychology constructs, particularly hope, in supporting YACS cope with cancer-related sequelae and re-establish goals across life domains after cancer, a relevant challenge facing many cancer survivors, particularly in young adulthood.

    “Moreover, this study highlights the potential utility of positive psychology constructs, particularly hope, in supporting YACS cope with cancer-related sequelae and re-establish goals across life domains after the cancer experience, a particularly relevant challenge facing many cancer survivors, particularly in young adulthood [2].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Cancer Society, 2014, Cancer Facts & Figures 2014
  2. Peterman AH, 2007, Personal Project Pursuit: Goals, Action, and Human Flourishing, 329
  3. Kin AM‐Y, 2004, Goals and social network composition among young adults with and without a history of cancer, J Psychol Chin Soc, 5, 97
  4. Pöhlmann K, 2010, Der Lebenszielfragebogen GOALS: Befunde zur internen und externen validität auf der basis einer repräsentativen bevölkerungsstichprobe und einer klinischen stichprobe. = The Life Goal Questionnaire GOALS: data on internal and external validity in a representative population survey and a clinical sample, Z Med Psychol, 19, 70

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hullmann, S. E., Robb, S. L., & Rand, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Hullmann, Stephanie E.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-19
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
387-399
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1559235859
Cited by
74
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R25-CA117865)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
life goals, cancer patients, self-regulation theory, psychological outcomes, cancer experience
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Goals, Humans, Life Change Events, Neoplasms, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v1) on 2026-09-24.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review