A single-session acceptance and commitment therapy intervention among women undergoing surgery for breast cancer: A randomized pilot trial to reduce persistent postsurgical pain.
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Oncologic breast surgeries carry a risk for persistent postsurgical pain. This study was a randomized pilot and feasibility study of a single-session Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention compared with treatment as usual among women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.Methods: Participants were recruited via letter of invitation and follow-up phone call from a single site in the United States from 2015 to 2017. Participants were at risk for persistent postsurgical pain, based on young age (<50), a preexisting chronic pain condition, or elevated anxiety, depression, or pain catastrophizing.Results: The 54 participants were female with a mean age of 52.91 years (SD=11.80). At 3-month postsurgery, 11% of the sample reported moderate-severe pain (>3 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale) in the operative breast or with arm movement. Written qualitative responses indicated that the majority of participants who received the intervention understood the concepts presented and reported continued practice of exercises learned in the session. The between group effect sizes for moderate-severe pain and elevated anxiety at 3-month post-surgery were small (Phi=0.08 and 0.16, respectively). The between group effect sizes for depression, pain acceptance, and pain catastrophizing at 3-month postsurgery were minimal.Conclusions: This study found small positive effects on postsurgical pain and anxiety for a single-session ACT intervention among women with breast cancer. This study supports the use of ACT with this population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
16 of 33 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Preoperative psychological distress, including depressive and anxious symptoms and pain catastrophizing, is an important risk factor for persistent postsurgical pain in this population.
“Preoperative psychological distress (depressive and anxious symptoms as well as pain catastrophizing) has emerged as an important risk factor [7–9].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] source
- cites [8] source
- cites [9] source
The Results and Discussion report associations among pain, anxiety and depression during breast and prostate cancer treatment, but do not address whether preoperative distress predicts persistent postsurgical pain. Searches for preoperative distress, pain catastrophizing and postsurgical pain found no passage addressing that risk-factor claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In those studies, the difference in pain between intervention and non-intervention groups was about 1 on average on a 0-10 scale.
“However, the difference in pain between intervention and non-intervention groups was about 1 (on average) on a 0–10 scale [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
The Persistent post-surgical pain section (page unavailable) reports a mean difference of 1.06 points on a 0–10 scale for active psychological interventions versus usual care. But the pooled difference across interventions was 0.56 points, while education or psychological support showed a 0.12-point difference. Thus, about 1 point describes the active-intervention subgroup, not the studies overall. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Single-session ACT interventions are gaining empirical support.
“Single session ACT interventions are gaining empirical support [23–26]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [23] source
The Discussion reports preliminary support for a one-day ACT workshop in at-risk Veterans, consistent with the claim that brief ACT interventions are gaining empirical support. However, the studied intervention also included an individualized postoperative booster session, so it was not strictly single-session. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] source
- cites [25] source
- cites [26] source
- Premisecitation
Education-only sessions did not improve post-surgical pain outcomes.
“A meta-analysis of psychological studies during the perioperative period found that single-session educational interventions demonstrated the greatest patient adherence; however, education only sessions did not improve post-surgical pain outcomes [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
- Premisecitation
Cognitive behavioral therapy and relaxation therapy have demonstrated positive effects in pain reduction following orthopedic, cardiac, and colorectal surgeries.
“Cognitive behavioral therapy and relaxation therapy have demonstrated positive effects in pain reduction following orthopedic, cardiac, and colorectal surgeries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis of psychological studies during the perioperative period found that single-session educational interventions demonstrated the greatest patient adherence.
“A meta-analysis of psychological studies during the perioperative period found that single-session educational interventions demonstrated the greatest patient adherence; however, education only sessions did not improve post-surgical pain outcomes [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
- Findingown data
The between-group effect size for pain catastrophizing at three months after surgery was minimal (Phi=0.02).
“The between group effect sizes for depression, pain acceptance, and pain catastrophizing at 3-months post-surgery were minimal.”
- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
“The effect size was minimal Phi=0.02.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
- Findingown data
The between-group effect size for elevated anxiety at three months after surgery was small (Phi=0.16).
“The between group effect sizes for moderate-severe pain and elevated anxiety at 3-months post-surgery were small (Phi=0.08 and 0.16, respectively).”
- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
“The effect size for difference between groups in anxiety was small Phi = 0.16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
- Findingown data
At three months after surgery, 11% of the sample reported moderate-to-severe pain (greater than 3 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale) in the operative breast or with arm movement.
“At 3-months post-surgery, 11% of the sample reported moderate-severe pain (>3 on a 0–10 numeric rating scale) in the operative breast or with arm movement.”
- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
“A total of 11% of the sample reported moderate-severe pain (>3 on a 0–10 scale) in the operative breast or with arm movement at 3-months follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
- Findingown data
The between-group effect size for depression at three months after surgery was minimal (Phi=0.01).
“The between group effect sizes for depression, pain acceptance, and pain catastrophizing at 3-months post-surgery were minimal.”
- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
“The effect size for difference between groups in depression was minimal Phi = 0.01.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
- Findingown data
The between-group effect size for moderate-to-severe pain at three months after surgery was small (Phi=0.08).
“The between group effect sizes for moderate-severe pain and elevated anxiety at 3-months post-surgery were small (Phi=0.08 and 0.16, respectively).”
- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
“The effect size was small: Phi = 0.08.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
- Findingown data
In the ACT group, 12.5% (3/24) reported elevated depression at three months, compared with 13.3% (4/30) in TAU.
“In the ACT group, 12.5% reported elevated depression (3/24) compared to 13.3% (4/30) in TAU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The one-week post-surgery moderate-to-severe pain variable was not significantly different between ACT (55%) and TAU (42%) arms.
“This variable was not significantly different between the ACT (55%) and TAU (42%) treatment arms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One-third of potential participants who declined participation noted a general sense of overwhelm as a reason for non-participation.
“Further, one-third of potential participants who declined participation noted a general sense of overwhelm as a reason for non-participation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At three months, 14.81% of participants screened positive for depression (≥10 on PHQ-8).
“A total of 9.26% of participants screened positive for anxiety (≥10 on the GAD-7) and 14.81% screened positive for depression (≥10 on the PHQ-8) at 3-months follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the ACT arm, 4.2% (1/24) reported elevated anxiety at three months, compared with 13.3% (4/30) in TAU.
“In the ACT arm, 4.2% of the sample reported elevated anxiety (1/24) compared to13.3% (4/30) in TAU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At one week after surgery, 48% of the sample reported moderate-to-severe post-operative pain.
“At one-week post-surgery, 48% of the sample reported moderate-severe post-operative pain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the ACT group, 8.3% (2/24) reported moderate-to-severe arm or movement pain at three months, compared with 13.3% (4/30) in TAU.
“In the ACT group, 8.3% of the sample reported moderate to severe arm or movement pain (2/24) compared to 13.3% in the TAU group (4/30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At three months, 3.7% of participants screened positive for pain catastrophizing (>20 on PCS).
“At 3-months follow-up, 3.7% of participants screened positive (above the 50th percentile) for pain catastrophizing (>20 on the PCS).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the ACT arm, 4.2% (1/24) reported elevated pain catastrophizing at three months, compared with 3.3% (1/30) in TAU.
“In the ACT arm 4.2% (1/24) reported elevated pain catastrophizing and 3.3% (1/30) in TAU.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The current sample was not highly distressed on average, despite inclusion criteria necessitating risk for persistent post-surgical pain.
“The current sample was also not highly distressed on average, despite inclusion criteria necessitating risk for persistent post-surgical pain, which included distress-based criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Participants particularly valued the mindfulness practice and values orientation work.
“Participants particularly valued the mindfulness practice and values orientation work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At three months, 9.26% of participants screened positive for anxiety (≥10 on GAD-7).
“A total of 9.26% of participants screened positive for anxiety (≥10 on the GAD-7) and 14.81% screened positive for depression (≥10 on the PHQ-8) at 3-months follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mean pain acceptance score at three months was 82.39 (SD=17.0) for the full sample (ACT M=83.35, SD=16.89; TAU M=81.69, SD=17.34).
“Mean pain acceptance score was 82.39 (SD=17.0) for the full sample (ACT M=83.35, SD=16.89; TAU M=81.69, SD=17.34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These findings indicate potential utility of ACT among breast cancer patients.
“These findings indicate the potential utility of ACT among breast cancer patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
ACT is an empirically supported treatment for minimizing the impairing impact of chronic pain, depression, and anxiety.
“ACT is an empirically supported treatment for minimizing the impairing impact of chronic pain [19], depression and anxiety [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The study supports the use of ACT with this population.
“This study supports the use of ACT with this population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The study found small positive effects on post-surgical pain and anxiety for a single-session ACT intervention among women with breast cancer.
“This study found small positive effects on post-surgical pain and anxiety for a single-session ACT intervention among women with breast cancer.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“This study found small positive effects on post-surgical pain and anxiety for a single-session ACT intervention among women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or DCIS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
- Interpretationown data
Some participants who may have benefited most from the intervention declined to participate.
“suggesting that some participants who may have benefited most from the intervention declined to participate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There were no significant differences between treatment and control arms on any baseline demographic, surgical, pain, or psychological variables.
“There were no significant differences between treatment and control arFmarriedms on any baseline demographic, surgical, pain, or psychological variables (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The sample in the current study was comprised of breast cancer patients, which limits generalizability to other disease groups.
“The sample in the current study was comprised of breast cancer patients, which limits generalizability to other disease groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The overall levels of persistent pain in the current sample (11% moderate-severe pain) were smaller than reported in previous literature, including a systematic review of 3,746 patients reporting a prevalence of 29.8%.
“The overall levels of persistent pain in the current sample (11% moderate-severe pain) were smaller than reported in previous literature, including a recent systematic review of 3,746 patients reporting a prevalence of 29.8% [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] source
- Interpretationown data
The current study may not have captured the most at-risk patients.
“This suggests that the current study may not have captured the most “at risk” patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Qualitative feedback suggested applicability of ACT in this population.
“Qualitative feedback suggested applicability of ACT in this population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
- May combine two claims. 12
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationYounger age is a risk factor for both persistent post-surgical pain and depression among women undergoing breast cancer surgery.
“younger age is a risk factor for both persistent post-surgical pain and depression among women undergoing breast cancer surgery [3, 7, 8][5, 12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 5 sources checked- cites [3] source
- cites [7] source
The Accepted Manuscript (p. 19) says younger age independently predicted persistent post-surgical pain after breast cancer surgery. It does not report that younger age predicted depression; the discussion of depression concerns its relationship to pain, not age as a risk factor for depression. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] source
- cites [5] source
- cites [12] source
The Results (Trajectory differences; page not supplied) report that younger women had elevated depressive symptoms during radiation treatment, but that the age difference had dissipated by the final study waves. The paper does not establish younger age as a risk factor for persistent post-surgical pain, so it supports only the depression portion of the sentence, with a time-limited qualification. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCo-morbid chronic pain conveys risk for persistent postsurgical pain in multiple surgical populations.
“Co-morbid chronic pain also conveys risk for persistent postsurgical pain in multiple surgical populations [11]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
The Introduction discusses pain as a symptom experienced by patients with cancer, while the Discussion reports predictors of depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients; neither addresses persistent postsurgical pain. Searches for persistent postsurgical pain and chronic pain as a risk factor after surgery found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA feasibility trial of a 6-session telephone-based ACT intervention for symptom interference among patients with metastatic breast cancer found reductions in fatigue and sleep interference.
“Another feasibility trial of a 6-session telephone-based ACT intervention for symptom interference among patients with metastatic breast cancer found reductions in fatigue and sleep interference [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAverage baseline depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing scores were well below clinical cut-offs, suggesting some restriction of range in this sample.
“Average baseline depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing scores were well below clinical cut-offs indicating elevated symptoms [31–33], suggesting some restriction of range in this sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe target sample size was N=60 (30 per group), consistent with recommended pilot sample sizes.
“Consistent with recommended pilot sample sizes derived from commonly-used approaches for pilot and feasibility trials [28–30], the target sample size was N=60 (30 per group).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBaseline pain acceptance in this study was higher than previously reported in an orthopedic surgery sample and in samples of patients with chronic pain, suggesting good pain coping at baseline.
“In addition, baseline pain acceptance found in this study was higher than previously reported in both an orthopedic surgery sample [23] and in samples of patients with chronic pain [17, 40], suggesting good pain coping at baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe between-group effect size for pain acceptance at three months after surgery was minimal (Cohen's d=0.10).
“The between group effect sizes for depression, pain acceptance, and pain catastrophizing at 3-months post-surgery were minimal.”
- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
“The effect size for difference between groups on pain catastrophizing was minimal: Cohen’s d=0.10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Intervention Effect at Three Months · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost participants who received the ACT intervention understood the concepts presented and reported continuing to practice exercises learned in the session, according to written qualitative responses.
“Written qualitative responses indicated that the majority of participants who received the intervention understood the concepts presented and reported continued practice of exercises learned in the session.”
- Also stated in: § Qualitative Feedback. · hedged
“Written qualitative responses indicated that the majority of participants who received the intervention understood the concepts presented and reported continued practice of exercises learned in the session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Qualitative Feedback. · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither median one-week post-operative breast pain nor movement pain was significantly different between ACT and TAU groups.
“Median one-week post-operative breast pain was 2.00 (IQR: 1.00–3.00) and median postoperative movement pain was 3.00 (IQR: 1.00–5.00), neither were significantly different between ACT and TAU groups (Supplemental File 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMedian one-week post-operative breast pain was 2.00 (IQR 1.00-3.00) and median postoperative movement pain was 3.00 (IQR 1.00-5.00).
“Median one-week post-operative breast pain was 2.00 (IQR: 1.00–3.00) and median postoperative movement pain was 3.00 (IQR: 1.00–5.00), neither were significantly different between ACT and TAU groups (Supplemental File 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pilot study found that the majority of women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or DCIS found a single-session ACT intervention useful and continued to use content learned.
“This pilot study found that the majority of women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or DCIS found a single session ACT intervention useful and continued to use content they had learned in the session.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study was a randomized pilot and feasibility trial comparing a single-session ACT intervention with treatment as usual in women undergoing breast cancer or DCIS surgery.
“This study was a randomized pilot and feasibility study of a single-session Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention compared to treatment as usual among women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAmong breast cancer treatment completers, a pilot 8-session ACT group intervention decreased depressive and anxious symptoms.
“Among breast cancer treatment completers, a pilot 8 session ACT group intervention decreased depressive and anxious symptoms [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNearly 30% of women have persistent pain following breast cancer surgeries, with 14% reporting moderate to severe pain.
“Nearly 30% of women have persistent pain following breast cancer surgeries [2], with 14% reporting moderate to severe pain [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency for the PCS in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.91; 3-months post-surgery α=0.93).
“Internal consistency in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.91; 3-months post-surgery α=0.93).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency for the CPAQ-20 in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.87; 3-months post-surgery α=0.87).
“Internal consistency in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.87; 3-months post-surgery α=0.87).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenRandomization was stratified by surgery type (mastectomy and lumpectomy).
“Randomization was stratified by surgery type (mastectomy and lumpectomy).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe therapist completed a fidelity checklist after each session to ensure all intervention domains were covered, and they were covered with each participant.
“After each session, the therapist completed a fidelity checklist to ensure each of these domains was covered (which they were with each participant).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenClinically, this study aligns with the broader literature supporting the use of ACT with this population.
“Clinically, this study aligns with the broader literature supporting the use of ACT with this population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03430765).
“The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03430765.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRandomization was performed in permuted blocks of 4 and 6.
“The randomization sequence was in permuted blocks of 4 and 6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency for the GAD-7 in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.85; 3-months post-surgery α=0.86).
“Internal consistency in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.85; 3-months post-surgery α=0.86).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency for the four pain severity items on the BPI was good (preoperative α=0.91; 3-months post-surgery α=0.93).
“Internal consistency for the four pain severity items on this measure was good (preoperative α=0.91; 3-months post-surgery α=0.93).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe use of mean imputation on multi-item measures with at least 85% complete data may have reduced variance in these variables.
“Another limitation is the use of mean imputation on multi-item measures with at least 85% complete, due to potentially reducing variance in these variables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe sample was largely Caucasian and higher income, so findings may not generalize to other patient populations.
“Finally, a significant limitation to this study was that the sample was largely Caucasian and higher income, so findings may not generalize to other patient populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTo increase intervention effects, a more intensive intervention may be needed in this population.
“In addition, to increase intervention effects, a more intensive intervention may be needed in this population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInternal consistency for the PHQ-8 in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.80; 3-months post-surgery α=0.85).
“Internal consistency in the current study was good (preoperative α=0.80; 3-months post-surgery α=0.85).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous RCTs of ACT applied perioperatively in orthopedic and breast surgery observed a decrease in pain interference and an improvement in anxiety levels.
“Based on previous work from RCTs with ACT applied perioperatively in orthopedic and breast surgery [79,80], in which a decrease in pain interference and an improvement in anxiety levels were observed”
From Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for the Management of Postsurgical Pain: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial (SPINE-ACT Study) (2023) · cites this paper as [80]
The Results (Intervention Effect at Three Months; page unavailable) report fewer participants with elevated anxiety in the ACT arm, and the Conclusion describes small positive effects on anxiety and postsurgical pain. The paper reports pain intensity, not a decrease in pain interference. This source is a breast-surgery pilot trial; the orthopedic-surgery study in the citing sentence would need support from the other citation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEven a single-session ACT intervention has yielded small but positive improvements in postsurgical pain and anxiety.
“Even a single-session ACT intervention has yielded small but positive improvements in postsurgical pain and anxiety, reinforcing its utility in this population [27].”
From Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on disease acceptance for breast cancer patients: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Two different pain-catastrophizing cutoffs
MajorThe Methods section defines elevated pain catastrophizing as PCS ≥30, but the later Measures section says the cutoff was 20. These statements cannot both be true within the same paper.
“Participants were determined to be “at risk” for persistent postsurgical pain if they met any of the following criteria: under the age of 50, having a pre-existing chronic pain condition, or elevated anxiety (≥10 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7-item scale [31]), depression (≥10 on the Personal Health Questionnaire Depression 8-item Scale [32]), or pain catastrophizing (≥30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale [33]).”
“A cut-off of 20 was used to indicate elevated levels of pain catastrophizing (i.e., above the 50th percentile compared to patients with chronic pain) [33].”
Overall depression rate conflicts with the group counts
MinorThe treatment-group counts give 7 participants with elevated depression out of 54, or 12.96%, not the reported 14.81%.
“14.81% screened positive for depression (≥10 on the PHQ-8) at 3-months follow-up.”
“In the ACT group, 12.5% reported elevated depression (3/24) compared to 13.3% (4/30) in TAU.”
Pain-acceptance effect is mislabeled as pain catastrophizing
MinorThe Cohen's d value appears in the pain-acceptance results but is described as an effect on pain catastrophizing. The analysis plan assigns Cohen's d to pain acceptance and Phi to pain catastrophizing.
“The effect size for difference between groups on pain catastrophizing was minimal: Cohen’s d=0.10.”
“Effect size differences on the outcome variables between the ACT and TAU arms were calculated using Phi (where 0.1 is considered a small effect size, 0.3 medium, and 0.5 large) for all categorical variables (pain, depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing), and Cohen’s d (where 0.2 is considered small, 0.5 medium, and 0.8 large) for the continuous variable (pain acceptance).”
Cites
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384 · cited 1× · see citing works
“All data were collected via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).(34)”
MethodThe PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This measure has demonstrated validity and reliability for assessing severity of depressive symptoms.(32) Internal consistency in the current study was good (preoperative α=.”
BackgroundMethodA Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A cut‐off of 10 was used on this measure to indicate elevated levels of anxiety, as this cut‐off has demonstrated optimized sensitivity and specificity in identifying clinical cases of Generalized Anxiety Disorder .(31)”
MethodThe qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Qualitative data were analyzed for thematic content using deductive content analysis.(39) Analyses were completed by the principle investigator who organized responses into thematic categories (broadly positive and negative responses to the intervention) and subcategories (responses to specific exercises and aspects o…”
MethodAcceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The session covered (a) check‐in about experiences in treatment, (b) values clarification, (c) brief mindfulness exercise, (d) differentiating between private events (thoughts, emotions, physical sensations) and behaviors, (e) acceptance and willingness exercises, (f) cognitive defusion exercises, and (g) committed ac…”
BackgroundInfluential(1999) · Cited by 5,934 · see citing works
Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies
Hertzog, M. A. (2008) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20247 · Cited by 2,337 · see citing works
Whitehead, A. L., Julious, S. A., Cooper, C. L., & Campbell, M. J. (2016) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280215588241 · Cited by 1,936 · see citing works
Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age
Linden, W., Vodermaier, A., MacKenzie, R., & Greig, D. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.025 · Cited by 1,245 · cited 1× · see citing works
“with poorer compliance, higher risk of mortality, and poorer quality of life.(5) Several factors confer risk for persistent postsurgical pain in this population.”
BackgroundOn the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination
Browne, R. H. (1995) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780141709 · Cited by 1,007 · see citing works
Gregg, J. A., Callaghan, G. M., Hayes, S. C., & Glenn-Lawson, J. L. (2007) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.75.2.336 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
Acceptance and commitment therapy: A meta-analytic review
Powers, M. B., Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, M. B., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2009) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000190790 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Andersen, K. G., & Kehlet, H. (2011) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Assessment of Depression and Anxiety in Breast Cancer Patients: Prevalence and Associated Factors
(2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.6.1661 · Cited by 435 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Comorbid chronic pain also conveys risk for persistent postsurgical pain in multiple surgical populations,(10) and younger age is a risk factor for both persistent postsurgical pain and depression among women undergoing breast cancer surgery(3,6,7,11,12) Other factors associated with depression and anxiety among women…”
BackgroundPain measures and cut-offs - 'no worse than mild pain' as a simple, universal outcome
Moore, R. A., Straube, S., & Aldington, D. (2013) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.12148 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Bruce, J., Thornton, A. J., Powell, R., Johnston, M., Wells, M., Heys, S. D., Thompson, A. M., Smith, C. W., Chambers, A. W., & Scott, N. W. (2014) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.028 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Biglan, A., & Hayes, S. C. (1996) · Applied and Preventive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0962-1849(96)80026-6 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Vowles, K. E., McCracken, L. M., McLeod, C., & Eccleston, C. (2008) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.08.012 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Belfer, I., Schreiber, K. L., Shaffer, J. R., Shnol, H., Blaney, K., Morando, A., Englert, D., Greco, C., Brufsky, A., Ahrendt, G., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.002 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Predictive factors for the development of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery
Andersen, K. G., Duriaud, H. M., Jensen, H. E., Kroman, N., & Kehlet, H. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000298 · Cited by 213 · cited 1× · see citing works
“of women have persistent pain following breast cancer surgeries,(2) with 14% reporting moderate to severe pain.(3) Persistent pain following breast cancer surgeries is associated with significant disability and distress,(4) and emotional distress in cancer patients is associated”
BackgroundInfluentialPrevalence of pain in patients with breast cancer post-treatment: A systematic review
Wang, K., Yee, C., Tam, S., Drost, L., Chan, S., Zaki, P., Rico, V., Ariello, K., Dasios, M., Lam, H., et al. (2018) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.08.105 · Cited by 176 · cited 1× · see citing works
“8%.(2) This suggests that the current study may not have captured the most “at risk” patients.”
BackgroundMendoza, T. R., Chen, C., Brugger, A. M., Hubbard, R. C., Snabes, M. C., Palmer, S. N., Zhang, Q., & Cleeland, C. S. (2004) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200409000-00011 · Cited by 167 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The BPI is a widely used 15‐item measure with established validity, which includes 4 items assessing pain severity.(36,37) Internal consistency for the four pain severity items on this measure was good (preoperative α=.”
MethodVanDenKerkhof, E. G., Peters, M. L., & Bruce, J. (2012) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e31824730c2 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Vowles, K. E., Wetherell, J. L., & Sorrell, J. T. (2009) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2008.08.001 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Wicksell, R. K., Olsson, G. L., & Melin, L. (2009) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.09.003 · Cited by 135 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This measure has demonstrated reliability and validity.(38)”
Costa, J., & Pinto‐Gouveia, J. (2011) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.718 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for weight control: Model, evidence, and future directions
Lillis, J., & Kendra, K. E. (2014) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.11.005 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Dindo, L., Zimmerman, M. B., Hadlandsmyth, K., StMarie, B., Embree, J., Marchman, J., Tripp-Reimer, T., & Rakel, B. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.016 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationMosher, C. E., Secinti, E., Li, R., Hirsh, A. T., Bricker, J., Miller, K. D., Schneider, B., Storniolo, A. M., Mina, L., Newton, E. V., et al. (2018) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4045-0 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another feasibility trial of a six‐session telephone‐based ACT intervention for symptom interference among patients with metastatic breast cancer found reductions in fatigue and sleep interference.(22) These findings indicate the potential utility of ACT among breast cancer patients.”
BackgroundPredictors and Consequences of Multiple Persistent Postmastectomy Pains
Kudel, I., Edwards, R. R., Kozachik, S., Block, B. M., Agarwal, S., Heinberg, L. J., Haythornthwaite, J. A., & Raja, S. N. (2007) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.013 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Relational Frame Theory: Some Implications for Understanding and Treating Human Psychopathology
Barnes‐Holmes, Y., Barnes‐Holmes, D., McHugh, L., & Hayes, S. C. (2004) · Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Wang, L., Chang, Y., Kennedy, S. A., Hong, P. J., Chow, N., Couban, R. J., McCabe, R. E., Bieling, P. J., & Busse, J. W. (2018) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.026 · Cited by 84 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A meta‐analysis of psychological studies during the perioperative period found that single‐session educational interventions demonstrated the greatest patient adherence; however, education only sessions did not improve postsurgical pain outcomes.(13) The current study proposed to pilot a single session intervention, t…”
BackgroundCharalambous, A., Giannakopoulou, M., Bozas, E., & Paikousis, L. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026809 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Of note, the relation between pain and depression can be bidirectional, such that increased pain is also associated with increased depression.(9) Comorbid chronic pain also conveys risk for persistent postsurgical pain in multiple surgical populations,(10) and younger age is a risk factor for both persistent postsurgi…”
Background(2015) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 68 · see citing works
One-day behavioral intervention in depressed migraine patients: effects on headache
Dindo, L., Recober, A., Marchman, J., O' Hara, M. W., & Turvey, C. (2014) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12258 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationCorrelates of Recovery Among Older Adults After Major Abdominal Surgery
Zalon, M. L. (2004) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-200403000-00005 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The BPI is a widely used 15‐item measure with established validity, which includes 4 items assessing pain severity.(36,37) Internal consistency for the four pain severity items on this measure was good (preoperative α=.”
MethodPredictors of depressive symptoms among breast cancer patients during the first year post diagnosis
Schlegel, R. J., Manning, M. A., Molix, L. A., Talley, A. E., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2012) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.559232 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Comorbid chronic pain also conveys risk for persistent postsurgical pain in multiple surgical populations,(10) and younger age is a risk factor for both persistent postsurgical pain and depression among women undergoing breast cancer surgery(3,6,7,11,12) Other factors associated with depression and anxiety among women…”
BackgroundAcceptance and Commitment Therapy
Hayes, S. C., & Pierson, H. (2006) · Encyclopedia of Cognitive Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/0-306-48581-8_1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Barreto, M., & Gaynor, S. T. (2018) · Behavior Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/bar0000093 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Single‐session ACT interventions are gaining empirical support,(23-26) including a recent case series of a 1‐ hour individual ACT session to promote health behavior change.(27) The current study designed an intervention that is more intensive than the 1‐hour health behavior change intervention (tailored to a breast ca…”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Society AC, 2019, Cancer Facts & Figures 2019
- Sullivan MJ, 2009, The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: User Manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments
Xiong, X., Zheng, L., Ding, Y., Chen, Y., Cai, Y., Wang, L., Huang, L., Liu, C., Shao, Z., & Yu, K. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02108-4 · Cited by 1,098 · see citing works
Dochat, C., Wooldridge, J. S., Herbert, M. S., Lee, M. W., & Afari, N. (2021) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.03.003 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“, 2018), and for pain acceptance in female breast cancer patients who underwent breast surgery (Hadlandsmyth et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGhorbani, V., Zanjani, Z., Omidi, A., & Sarvizadeh, M. (2021) · Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy · doi:10.47626/2237-6089-2020-0022 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Li, H., Wu, J., Ni, Q., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & He, G. (2021) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/nnr.0000000000000499 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Nadinda, P. G., van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., & Peters, M. L. (2022) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002521 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Nine studies were conducted in the United States, 2,6,10–12, 20,21,39 ,42 3 studies were conducted in 44,45 2 studies in the United Kingdom,”
Hall, A. E., Nguyen, N. H., Cascavita, C. T., Shariati, K., Patel, A. K., Chen, W., Kang, Y., Ren, X., Tseng, C.-H., Hidalgo, M. A., et al. (2025) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000006677 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“67,68 However, within our systematic review, only one study using ACT met inclusion criteria and could not be included in our meta-analysis due to insuf fi cient reported data.”
Remote Psychological Interventions for Fear of Cancer Recurrence: Scoping Review.
Cincidda, C., Pizzoli, S. F. M., & Pravettoni, G. (2022) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/29745 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Finally, with regard to web-based interventions based on ACT, the studies recovered in the literature were few, and in the oncology field, we found only 11% (4/35) of studies; 50% (2/4) of them were for patients with cancer and the others for partners [54-57].”
MethodAnagnostopoulos, F., Paraponiari, A., & Kafetsios, K. G. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-022-09921-5 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“…wave” cognitive and behavioral therapies, including mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy (Georgescu, Dobrean, & Predescu, 2018; Dimidjian et al., 2016; Hadlandsmyth et al., 2019; Hayes & Hofmann, 2021; Roslyakova et al., 2021).”
BackgroundPang, N. T. P., Tio, V. C. S., Bhupendar Singh, A. S., Tseu, M. W. L., Shoesmith, W. D., Abd Rahim, M. A., & Mohd Kassim, M. A. (2022) · Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy · doi:10.47626/2237-6089-2020-0172 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Misra, A., Bryan, A., S. Faber, N., Printz Pereira, D., Faber, S., T. Williams, M., & D. Skinta, M. (2023) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.05.008 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Pester, B., Yoon, J., Yamin, J. B., Papianou, L., Edwards, R. R., & Meints, S. M. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12072608 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Hymowitz, G., Hasan, F., Yerramalli, G., & Cervoni, C. (2024) · The American Surgeon™ · doi:10.1177/00031348221117025 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Psychotherapeutic Considerations for Patients With Terminal Illness
Kredentser, M. S., & Chochinov, H. M. (2020) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20190048 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Song, W., Shari, N. I., Song, J., Zhang, R., Mansor, N. S., Leong Bin Abdullah, M. F. I., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0312669 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Effect of Pain Coping Skills Training on Pain and Pain Medication Use for Women With Breast Cancer
Fisher, H. M., Hyland, K. A., Winger, J. G., Miller, S. N., Amaden, G. H., Diachina, A. K., Kelleher, S. A., & Somers, T. J. (2023) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.012 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Consensus statement on chronic pain treatment in cancer survivors
Mamiya, K., Iida, H., Iseki, M., Yamaguch, S., Yonekura, H., Ueno, H., Kosugi, T., Sasara, T., Takao, Y., Takasusuki, T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Anesthesia · doi:10.1007/s00540-024-03427-0 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…been shown to reduce depression, anxiety, and fear of recurrence in cancer survivors [81], and a systematic review found that it improved psychological flexibility and quality of life, while RCTs revealed that it partially prevented postoperative chronic pain in patients with breast cancer [82].”
Can perioperative psychological interventions reduce chronic pain after surgery?
Peters, M. L. (2023) · British Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.12968/hmed.2022.0400 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Hong, T., Wang, C., Jiang, Y., Shi, Q., Liang, W. Y., & Li, D. (2023) · BMC Anesthesiology · doi:10.1186/s12871-023-02143-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“reported a single psychological intervention for women undergoing breast cancer surgery and found that it posed some small positive effects on postsurgical pain and anxiety [16].”
BackgroundShi, Y., Yu, H., Wang, L., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Surgery · doi:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1693290 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Mirzaei, S., Bagherian-Sararoudi, R., Davazdahemami, M. H., Izadi, R., & Sharbafchi, M. R. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06823-2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Thota, R. S., Ramkiran, S., Jayant, A., Kumar, K. S., Wajekar, A. S., Iyer, S., & Ashwini, M. J. (2024) · Indian Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/ija.ija_405_24 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Sakai, M., Kondo, M., Sugiura, T., & Akechi, T. (2022) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12422 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sauer, C., & Maatouk, I. (2020) · PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie · doi:10.1055/a-1174-0283 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“[24] Hadlandsmyth K, Dindo LN, Wajid R et al.”
BackgroundThe effect of acceptance commitment therapy on the mental health of elderly breast cancer patients
Ruan, Y., Xie, W. Y., & Xu, F. (2025) · World Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1186/s12957-025-04056-x · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“The core of ACT is to accept rather than confront pain, clarify and practice values, which is very in line with the psychological needs of elderly patients [21].”
Factores psicosociales asociados con la intensidad de dolor por cáncer: una revisión narrativa
Mendoza-Contreras, L. A., Trejo, B. D., Medina, D. A. R., & Vazquez, O. (2024) · Psicología y Salud · doi:10.25009/pys.v34i2.2907 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Castaño-Asins, J. R., Sanabria-Mazo, J. P., Luciano, J. V., Barceló-Soler, A., Martín-López, L. M., Del Arco-Churruca, A., Lafuente-Baraza, J., Bulbena, A., Pérez-Solà, V., & Montes-Pérez, A. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12124066 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Based on previous work from RCTs with ACT applied perioperatively in orthopedic and breast surgery [79,80], in which a decrease in pain interference and an improvement in anxiety levels were observed, we expect to be able to provide the scientific community with greater evidence of the usefulness of ACT perioperativel…”
MethodZari Moin, Z., Abolmaali Alhosseini, K., & Sirafi, M. R. (2022) · Archives of Breast Cancer · doi:10.32768/abc.202294497-504 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“ACT is based on the belief that psychological problems, disorders, and dissatisfactions are caused on account of poor psychological flexibility.11,12 Numerous researchers have confirmed the efficiency of ACT in improving physical and psychological disorders.13-15 Hadlandsmyth et al.16 demonstrated that ACT significant…”
BackgroundPsychosocial Interventions for Pain Management in Breast Cancer Survivors: A RE-AIM Evaluation
Cox-Martin, E., Phimphasone‐Brady, P., Hoffecker, L., & Glasgow, R. E. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-022-09874-9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Martorella, G., Hanley, A. W., & Muessig, K. E. (2025) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/69010 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Yamin, J. B., Wilson, J. M., Pester, B., Allen, C., Yoon, J., Cornelius, M. C., Dharmendran, D., Steinhilber, K., Crago, M. A., Kazemipour, S., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Pain Research · doi:10.3389/fpain.2025.1558753 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rehman, S., Ghazali, S. R., & Elklit, A. (2026) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10879-026-09731-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kennedy, S. K. F., Sadeghi, S., Dehkordi, S. R., Lee, S. F., Kirk, D., Cheung, Y. T., Haywood, D., Grech, L., Ramsey, I., Guedes, H., et al. (2025) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op-25-00081 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mosher, C. E., Lewson, A. B., Austin-Wright, M., Matthias, M. S., Helft, P. R., Turk, A. A., Loehrer, P. J., Sehdev, A., Al-Hader, A. A., & Johns, S. A. (2025) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/spcare-2025-005548 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“20 21 This informs future ACT research by pointing to potential intervention mechanisms and outcomes that warrant further study.”
Tan, M., Karakaş, S. A., Ekinci, M., Ersöğütçü, F., & Aksoy, A. (2025) · Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira · doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20241027 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“A study of women with breast cancer reported that ACT has positive effects on pain and anxiety 17 .”
Kocarslan, B., Genç, H. A., Yorgancıgil, E., Yükselen, G., Albayrak, Z. S., Aydın, G., Erdoğan, S., Akın, A., & Demirtas-Tatlidede, A. (2026) · Brain Science · doi:10.3390/brainsci16060564
“While standard ACT training spans between 6 and 8 weeks, several studies revealed that participants reported significant improvements in dealing with difficult emotions even after single-session ACT interventions [47–49].”
Sakai, M., Toyama, T., Hashimoto, H., Ueno, T., Wanifuchi‐Endo, Y., Fujita, T., Asano, T., Horisawa, N., Uchida, M., & Akechi, T. (2026) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s574843
Gkofa, V., Godfrey, E. L., & Scott, W. (2026) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2026.100994
Ziadni, M. S., Dildine, T. C., Edwards, K. A., Herrick, A., You, D. S., & Darnall, B. D. (2026) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2026.106220
Eficacia de la Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso (ACT) en pacientes con cáncer de mama
Martínez, A. L., Vázquez-Romo, R., Quintero, E. A. T., Neri-Flores, V., & Rivera-Fong, L. (2025) · LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades · doi:10.56712/latam.v6i4.4385
Early Evaluation of Psychological Factors after Traumatic Injury
Kruger, E. S., Cummings, D., Curtis, W., Shultz, C., & Wharton, M. G. (2025) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000001318
Castaño-Asins, J. R., Sanabria‐Mazo, J. P., Royuela-Colomer, E., Luciano, J. V., Polanco, M., & Montes, A. (2025) · Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor · doi:10.20986/resed.2025.4214/2025
Yamin, J. B., Pester, B., Kommu, R., Allen, C., Dharmendran, D., Steinhilber, K., Crago, M. A., Kazemipour, S., Franqueiro, A. R., Fentazi, D., et al. (2024) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107785
A Psychological Approach to Functional Illness
Carlson, A. A., & Tkachuk, G. A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12998-8_19
Non pharmaceutics Therapy for Oncological Patients
Rajasekhara, S., Donovan, K. A., & Thompson, L. M. A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50977-3_14 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Somers, T. J., Kelleher, S. A., & Check, D. K. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75377-1_7
- Authors
- Hadlandsmyth, K., Dindo, L. N., Wajid, R., Sugg, S. L., Zimmerman, M. B., & Rakel, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hadlandsmyth, Katherine
- Venue
- Psycho-Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-30
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2210-2217
- ISSN
- 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1611
- PMC
- PMC8908355
- OpenAlex
- W2969471105
- Semantic Scholar
- 676b944e20b974570349a3049dc2dc966a6151db
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (54TR001013)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32 NS045549)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- acceptance and commitment therapy, breast cancer surgery, chronic postoperative pain, single-session intervention, ductal carcinoma in situ, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, chronic pain
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Pain, Pilot Projects, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Catastrophization, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review