Cited by 6Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ProteinDJ : A high‐performance and modular protein design pipeline

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Leveraging artificial intelligence and deep learning to generate proteins de novo (a.k.a. ‘synthetic proteins’) has unlocked new frontiers of protein design. Deep learning models trained on protein structures can generate novel protein designs that explore structural landscapes unseen by evolution. This approach enables the development of bespoke binders that target specific proteins and domains through new protein–protein interactions. However, successful binder generation can suffer from low in silico success rates, often requiring thousands of designs and hundreds of GPU hours to obtain enough hits for experimental testing. While workstation implementations are available for binder design, these are limited in both scalability and throughput. There is a lack of efficient open‐source protein design pipelines for high‐performance computing (HPC) systems that can maximize hardware resources and parallelize the workflow efficiently. Here, we present ‘ProteinDJ’—an implementation of a synthetic protein design workflow that is deployable on HPC systems using the Nextflow portable workflow management system and Apptainer containerisation. It parallelizes the workload across both GPUs and CPUs, facilitating generation and testing of hundreds of designs per hour, accelerating the discovery process. ProteinDJ is designed to be modular and includes RoseTTAFold Diffusion (RFdiffusion) or BindCraft for fold generation, ProteinMPNN or Full‐Atom MPNN (FAMPNN) for sequence design, and AlphaFold2 or Boltz‐2 for prediction and validation of designs and binder‐target interfaces, with supporting packages for structural evaluation of designs. ProteinDJ democratizes protein binder design through its robust and user‐friendly implementation and provides a framework for future protein design pipelines. ProteinDJ is freely available at https://github.com/PapenfussLab/proteindj .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pro.70464

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Ahern W, 2025, Atom‐level enzyme active site scaffolding using rfdiffusion2, Nat Methods
  2. 10.1038/s41467-023-38328-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Boitreaud J, 2024, Chai‐1: decoding the molecular interactions of life, bioRxiv
  4. Butcher J, 2025, De novo design of all‐atom biomolecular interactions with rfdiffusion3, bioRxiv.
  5. 10.1038/s41586-022-04654-9 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI
  7. Cho Y, 2025, Boltzdesign1: inverting all‐atom structure prediction model for generalized biomolecular binder design, bioRxiv
  8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Corley N, 2025, Accelerating biomolecular modeling with atomworks and rf3, bioRxiv
  10. Cotet T‐S, 2025, Crowdsourced protein design: lessons from the adaptyv egfr binder competition, bioRxiv
  11. 10.1038/s41592-025-02626-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nbt.3820 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dunbrack RL, 2025, Res ipsae loquunt: What's wrong with alphafold's iptm score and how to fix it, bioRxiv
  14. Ertelt M, 2024, Hypermpnn‐a general strategy to design thermostable proteins learned from hyperthermophiles, bioRxiv
  15. 10.1016/j.str.2025.08.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.adq1741 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013747 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41586-024-07601-y · DOI
  20. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kim AR, 2024, Enhanced protein‐protein interaction discovery via alphafold‐multimer, bioRxiv
  22. 10.1038/s41467-022-34937-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/prot.26030 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/s41392-024-02036-3 · DOI
  25. NobelPrize.org.The nobel prize in chemistry 2024.2025https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/press-release/
  26. Overath MD, 2025, Predicting experimental success in de novo binder design: a meta‐analysis of 3,766 experimentally characterised binders, bioRxiv
  27. 10.1038/s41586-025-09429-6 · DOI
  28. Passaro S, 2025, Boltz‐2: towards accurate and efficient binding affinity prediction, bioRxiv
  29. Prihoda D, 2025, Ovo, an open‐source ecosystem for de novo protein design, bioRxiv
  30. Sappington I, 2024, Improved protein binder design using beta‐pairing targeted rfdiffusion, bioRxiv
  31. Shuai RW, 2025, Sidechain conditioning and modeling for full‐atom protein sequence design with fampnn, bioRxiv
  32. Stark H, 2025, Boltzgen: Toward universal binder design, bioRxiv
  33. 10.1038/s41586-024-08393-x · DOI
  34. Zambaldi V, 2024, De novo design of high‐affinity protein binders with alphaproteo, arXiv
  35. Zheng H, 2025, Alphafold3 in drug discovery: a comprehensive assessment of capabilities, limitations, and applications, bioRxiv
  36. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Silke, D., Iskander, J., Pan, J., Thompson, A. P., Papenfuss, A. T., Lucet, I. S., & Hardy, J. M.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Lucet, Isabelle S.
  • Hardy, Joshua M.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-01-21
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
e70464-e70464
ISSN
  • 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-896X
OpenAlex
W7125268306
Cited by
6
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (2008096, 2020377, 2026643)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein design, synthetic proteins, protein binder design, protein-protein interaction, deep learning protein design, de novo protein folding, workflow automation, Nextflow, Apptainer, high-performance computing, ProteinMPNN, AlphaFold2, Boltz-2, open source software
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Proteins, Software, Protein Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review