The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ZRANK: Reranking protein docking predictions with an optimized energy function
Abstract
Protein–protein docking requires fast and effective methods to quickly discriminate correct from incorrect predictions generated by initial‐stage docking. We have developed and tested a scoring function that utilizes detailed electrostatics, van der Waals, and desolvation to rescore initial‐stage docking predictions. Weights for the scoring terms were optimized for a set of test cases, and this optimized function was then tested on an independent set of nonredundant cases. This program, named ZRANK, is shown to significantly improve the success rate over the initial ZDOCK rankings across a large benchmark. The amount of test cases with No. 1 ranked hits increased from 2 to 11 and from 6 to 12 when predictions from two ZDOCK versions were considered. ZRANK can be applied either as a refinement protocol in itself or as a preprocessing stage to enrich the well‐ranked hits prior to further refinement. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations
Brooks, B. R., Bruccoleri, R. E., Olafson, B. D., States, D. J., Swaminathan, S., & Karplus, M. (1983) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540040211 · Cited by 14,944
Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing.
Birchenhall, C., Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1994) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234664 · Cited by 4,355
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Crimins, F. (2003) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-003-0001-6 · Cited by 2,000
Abagyan, R., Totrov, M., & Kuznetsov, D. (1994) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540150503 · Cited by 1,699
ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm
Chen, R., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10389 · Cited by 1,393
Self-citationSimulation of activation free energies in molecular systems
Neria, E., Fischer, S., & Karplus, M. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.472061 · Cited by 1,322
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Gray, J. J., Moughon, S., Wang, C., Schueler-Furman, O., Kuhlman, B., Rohl, C. A., & Baker, D. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00670-3 · Cited by 1,127
Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesem, A. A., Aflalo, C., & Vakser, I. A. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.6.2195 · Cited by 1,107
ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes
Comeau, S. R., Gatchell, D. W., Vajda, S., & Camacho, C. J. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg371 · Cited by 855
Gabb, H. A., Jackson, R. M., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1203 · Cited by 817
Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations
Ritchie, D. W., & Kemp, G. J. L. (2000) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000501)39:2<178::aid-prot8>3.0.co;2-6 · Cited by 563
Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins
Zhang, C., Vasmatzis, G., Cornette, J. L., & DeLisi, C. (1997) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0859 · Cited by 536
Prediction of protein–protein interactions by docking methods
Smith, G. R., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00285-3 · Cited by 446
A protein–protein docking benchmark
Chen, R., Mintseris, J., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10390 · Cited by 344
Self-citationAnchor residues in protein–protein interactions
Rajamani, D., Thiel, S., Vajda, S., & Camacho, C. J. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0401942101 · Cited by 334
RDOCK: Refinement of rigid‐body protein docking predictions
Li, L., Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10460 · Cited by 330
Self-citationFlexible protein–protein docking
Bonvin, A. M. (2006) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.002 · Cited by 309
A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein‐protein docking
Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10334 · Cited by 298
Self-citationProtein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit
Mandell, J. G., Roberts, V. A., Pique, M. E., Kotlovyi, V., Mitchell, J. C., Nelson, E., Tsigelny, I., & Ten Eyck, L. F. (2001) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/14.2.105 · Cited by 297
Protein–protein docking benchmark 2.0: An update
Mintseris, J., Wiehe, K., Pierce, B., Anderson, R., Chen, R., Janin, J., & Weng, Z. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20560 · Cited by 278
Self-citationRapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem
Jackson, R. M., Gabb, H. A., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1519 · Cited by 246
Protein docking for low-resolution structures
Vakser, I. A. (1995) · "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection" · doi:10.1093/protein/8.4.371 · Cited by 245
A geometry-based suite of moleculardocking processes
Fischer, D., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H. L., & Nussinov, R. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(95)80063-8 · Cited by 188
Smith, G. R., Sternberg, M. J. E., & Bates, P. A. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.058 · Cited by 169
ZDOCK and RDOCK performance in CAPRI rounds 3, 4, and 5
Wiehe, K. J., Pierce, B. G., Mintseris, J., Tong, W. W., Anderson, R., Chen, R., & Weng, Z. (2005) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20559 · Cited by 115
Self-citationZDOCK predictions for the CAPRI challenge
Chen, R., Tong, W., Mintseris, J., Li, L., & Weng, Z. (2003) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10388 · Cited by 83
Self-citationFanelli, F., & Ferrari, S. (2006) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2005.12.002 · Cited by 29
Cited by
Ihle, N. T., Byers, L. A., Kim, E. S., Saintigny, P., Lee, J. J., Blumenschein, G. R., Tsao, A., Liu, S., Larsen, J. E., Wang, J., et al. (2012) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djr523 · Cited by 532
Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions from the Molecular to the Proteome Level
Keskin, O., Tuncbag, N., & Gursoy, A. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00683 · Cited by 369
Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4379 · Cited by 335
Self-citationBenchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.23.465575 · Cited by 335
Self-citationCPORT: A Consensus Interface Predictor and Its Performance in Prediction-Driven Docking with HADDOCK
de Vries, S. J., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017695 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierce, B., & Weng, Z.
- Venue
- Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1078-1086
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2129454543
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
