Cited by 56Protein Structure and DynamicsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Antibody H3 structure prediction

Open access
Marks, C., Deane, C.M.·2017·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Antibodies are proteins of the immune system that are able to bind to a huge variety of different substances, making them attractive candidates for therapeutic applications. Antibody structures have the potential to be useful during drug development, allowing the implementation of rational design procedures. The most challenging part of the antibody structure to experimentally determine or model is the H3 loop, which in addition is often the most important region in an antibody's binding site. This review summarises the approaches used so far in the pursuit of accurate computational H3 structure prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2017.01.010

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Totrov M. Loop simulations Homology Modeling: Methods and Protocols (Methods in Molecular Biology) 2012 Humana Press Ch. 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marks, C., & Deane, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Marks, C.
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2017-01
Volume
15
Pages
222-231
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2583289470
Cited by
56
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G037280/1)
  • UCB Pharma Ltd.
  • Roche
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
antibody structure prediction, antibody binding sites, therapeutic antibodies, rational antibody design, computational protein structure prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review