Cited by 373Pharmaceutical studies and practicesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Good Practices in Model‐Informed Drug Discovery and Development: Practice, Application, and Documentation

Open access
EFPIA MID3 Workgroup, Marshall, SF, Burghaus, R, Cosson, V, Cheung, SYA, Chenel, M, DellaPasqua, O, Frey, N +11 more·2016·CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

Abstract

This document was developed to enable greater consistency in the practice, application, and documentation of Model‐Informed Drug Discovery and Development (MID3) across the pharmaceutical industry. A collection of “good practice” recommendations are assembled here in order to minimize the heterogeneity in both the quality and content of MID3 implementation and documentation. The three major objectives of this white paper are to: i) inform company decision makers how the strategic integration of MID3 can benefit R&D efficiency; ii) provide MID3 analysts with sufficient material to enhance the planning, rigor, and consistency of the application of MID3; and iii) provide regulatory authorities with substrate to develop MID3 related and/or MID3 enabled guidelines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/psp4.12049

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]EMA/EFPIA M&S workshop 2011. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/events/2011/07/event_detail_000440.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c3 (2011).
  2. [7]EMA/EFPIA European Medicines Agency/European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations workshop on the importance of dose finding and dose selection for the successful development, licensing and lifecycle management of medicinal products. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/events/2014/06/event_detail_000993.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c3 (2014).
  3. [49]Holford, N.H.G., Mould, D.R. & Peck, C.C. Disease progression models In Principles of Clinical Pharmacology 2nd edn. (ed. Atkinson A) 369– 379 (Academic Press, New York, 2006).
  4. [53]Meibohm, B. & Derendorf, H. Basic concept of PK/PD modeling. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 35, 401– 413 (1997). 9352388
  5. [59]Mould, D.R. Models for disease progression: new approaches and uses. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 92, 125– 131 (2012). 22617225

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Workgroup, E. M., Marshall, S., Burghaus, R., Cosson, V, Cheung, S., Chenel, M., DellaPasqua, O., Frey, N., Hamrén, B., Harnisch, L., Ivanow, F., Kerbusch, T., Lippert, J., Milligan, P., Rohou, S., Staab, A., Steimer, J., Tornøe, C., & Visser, S.
Affiliations
  • Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Clinical Pharmacology Modelling & Simulation GlaxoSmithKline R&D Ltd Uxbridge UK
  • Janssen (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • MSD (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Pharmacometrics Pfizer Ltd Sandwich UK
  • Global Regulatory Affairs & Policy AstraZeneca Paris France
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Quantitative Pharmacology & Pharmacometrics Merck & Co Kenilworth USA
Corresponding author
Marshall, SF
Venue
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
93-122
ISSN
2163-8306 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2181278642
Cited by
373
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
22.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
good practice recommendations, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, R&D efficiency, regulatory guidelines, pharmaceutical industry
MeSH terms
Documentation, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Drug Design, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review