The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long‐wave radiation from clear skies
Abstract
Analysis of the observations of long‐wave radiation from clear skies, R, made by Dines at Benson, yields a correlation coefficient of 0·99 between R and the black‐body radiation at the corresponding screen temperature T. A new series of measurements over wider ranges of temperature and humidity confirms this, with the same value for the correlation between R and σT 4, the regression equation being: R = −17·195 σT 4 (milliwatt cm−, T °K). An alterlative representation of equals accuracy is R = 5·31.10−14 T−6 (Milliwatt cm−2, T°K) The latter formulation is probably better founded physically, and brings out the temperature dependence of the ‘effective emissivity’ ϵ (i.e. R/σT 4), which the atmosphere must exhibit. Either expression provides an estimate of R in terms of T with a probable error less than 0·5 mw cm−2. The present analysis omits any explicit reference to the influence of vapour pressure e on R, and so differs essentially from those due to Brunt and Angström. Re‐appraisal of these latter suggests that the relationships established therein between * and e result basically from a correlation between temperature and humidity. Both the nature and the degree of the correlation between RσT 4 and e for a given locality would then depend on the temperature‐humidity regime occurring there. The wide variations from place to place, both in the values of the coefficients occurring in the Brunt and Angström equations, and in the degree of correlation found between R/σT 4 and the corresponding function of e, are thereby explained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Revisiting concepts of thermal physiology: predicting responses of mammals to climate change
Mitchell, D., Snelling, E. P., Hetem, R. S., Maloney, S. K., Strauss, W. M., & Fuller, A. (2018) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12818 · Cited by 299
Photovoltaic–thermal collectors for night radiative cooling of buildings
Eicker, U., & Dalibard, A. (2011) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2011.03.015 · Cited by 235
Fuller, A., Mitchell, D., Maloney, S. K., Hetem, R. S., Fonsêca, V. F. C., Meyer, L. C. R., van de Ven, T. M. F. N., & Snelling, E. P. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.238113 · Cited by 141
Burtt (1986) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40166782 · Cited by 130
Computation of thermal comfort inside a passenger car compartment
Mezrhab, A., & Bouzidi, M. (2006) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.11.008 · Cited by 123
Dynamic thermal performance of inclined double-skin roof: Modeling and experimental investigation
Zingre, K. T., Yang, E.-H., & Wan, M. P. (2017) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.181 · Cited by 56
Norton, T., Grant, J., Fallon, R., & Sun, D.-W. (2010) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2010.04.002 · Cited by 51
Cooling load reduction of buildings using passive roof options
Raeissi, S., & Taheri, M. (1996) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/0960-1481(95)00123-9 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Swinbank, W. C.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-07
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 381
- Pages
- 339-348
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2152015685
- Cited by
- 1,631
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.