Cited by 79Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Savouring and Self‐compassion as Protective Factors for Depression

Ford, Justin, Klibert, Jeffrey J., Tarantino, Nicholas, Lamis, Dorian A.·2017·Stress and Health

Abstract

Within positive psychology, researchers and clinicians vocalize the need to expand upon how the treatment for major depressive disorder is conceptualized and implemented. The impetus of the current study was to examine preliminary criteria for identifying savouring and self-compassion as protective factors for depression. Undergraduate students (N = 133) completed a series of surveys at two points in time, 5 weeks apart. Results revealed that savouring and self-compassion were inversely related to depression scores cross-sectionally and prospectively. However, savouring was the only positive psychological variable to predict changes in depression scores across time. Cross-sectionally, savouring was also found to moderate the relation between negative life events and depression, such that the strength of the relation between negative life events and depression decreased when higher savouring was present. However, this same effect was not significant prospectively. There was no evidence, cross-sectionally or prospectively, that self-compassion moderated the relation between negative life events and depression. Taken together, results provide preliminary support for savouring as a protective factor for depressive symptoms. Mental health professionals should consider teaching savouring strategies to help at-risk clients stimulate and sustain positive affect as a means of preventing and reducing depressive symptoms. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.2687

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in negative mood level during pregnancy were observed between women with PND and healthy women.

    “In accordance with our second hypothesis and given the relationship between acceptance and emotional regulation [71], we observed differences in negative mood level during pregnancy between women with PND and healthy women.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, J., Klibert, J. J., Tarantino, N., & Lamis, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Southern University (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Klibert, Jeffrey J.
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
119-128
ISSN
  • 1532-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-3005
OpenAlex
W2409316511
Cited by
78
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stress and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
savoring, self-compassion, depression, protective factors, major depressive disorder, negative life events, positive affect, depressive symptoms, moderation, positive psychology interventions, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Self Concept, Young Adult, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review