CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Workplace telepressure and work–life balance outcomes: The role of work recovery experiences

Barber, Larissa K., Conlin, Amanda L., Santuzzi, Alecia M.·2019·Stress and Health
DOI 10.1002/smi.2864
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Workplace technology has posed some challenges to worker well‐being. This research examined how workplace telepressure—a preoccupation and urge to respond quickly to message‐based communications—is related to work life balance evaluations, as well as how work recovery experiences might explain this relationship. Using an online survey design, Study 1 ( N = 254) and Study 2 ( N = 409) demonstrated that employees' workplace telepressure negatively related to satisfaction with work–life balance. Study 1 showed that psychological detachment may explain the relationship between workplace telepressure and satisfaction with work–life balance. In Study 2, psychological detachment and control over leisure time explained the relationship between workplace telepressure and global evaluations of work–life balance (satisfaction and effectiveness). Mastery and control experiences explained the relationship between workplace telepressure and work–family enrichment. Lastly, three recovery mechanisms (detachment, relaxation, and control) explained the link between workplace telepressure and work–family conflict. The evidence suggests that workplace telepressure is negatively associated with various employee evaluations of work–life balance, but the role of recovery experiences may depend on how work–life balance is measured.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.2864

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Allen T. D., 2013, The work‐family role interface: A synthesis of the research from industrial and organizational psychology, Handbook of Psychology, 2, 698
  2. Arbuckle J. L., 2014, Amos (version 24.0) [computer program]
  3. 10.1002/smi.2668 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.772650 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/0149206307302552 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Carlson D. S., 2009, Work–family balance: Is balance more than conflict and enrichment?, Human Relations, 20, 1
  7. 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/apl0000259 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1108/S2046-410X(2013)0000001016 · DOI
  11. Dimotakis N., 2013, Modern research methods for the study of behavior in organizations, 319
  12. 10.5465/amr.2000.2791609 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/a0019462 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.65 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1348/096317905X26769 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01023.x · DOI
  18. 10.1037/a0032754 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/smi.2792 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1523422307305487 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1368 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.10.007 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Leu D. J., 2004, Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies, Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5, 1570
  26. 10.1080/01446193.2010.480977 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/a0017443 · DOI
  28. 10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1027/1866-5888/a000114 · DOI
  30. 10.1037/a0022759 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/1467-8721.00108 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.017 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s41542-018-0022-8 · DOI
  34. Sonnentag S., 2017, Feeling interrupted‐ Being responsive: How online messages relate to affect at work, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 1
  35. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1512 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/peps.12132 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00035-6 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s10869-017-9520-y · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1177/0893318914533332 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 139

Metadata

Authors
Barber, L. K., Conlin, A. L., & Santuzzi, A. M.
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-30
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
350-362
ISSN
  • 1532-3005
  • 1532-2998
DOI
10.1002/smi.2864
Cited by
139
References
13
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review