Cited by 32COVID-19 and Mental HealthSleep and related disordersLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Longitudinal associations between stress and sleep disturbances during COVID-19

Open access
Ballesio, Andrea, Zagaria, Andrea, Musetti, Alessandro, Lenzo, Vittorio, Palagini, Laura, Quattropani, Maria Catena, Vegni, Elena, Bonazza, Federica +8 more·2022·Stress and Health

Abstract

The psychological consequences of COVID-19 pandemic may include the activation of stress systems, that involve the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis which influences many physiological functions, including sleep. Despite epidemiological studies evidenced greater prevalence of stress symptoms and sleep disturbances during COVID-19, longitudinal evidence investigating the effects of stress on sleep disturbances during the pandemic is lacking. We collected measures of perceived stress and sleep disturbances during the first wave of COVID-19 (March 2020) and at 8-10 months follow up in a sample of 648 adults (M = 33.52, SD = 12.98 years). Results showed that 39.4% of participants reported moderate to extremely severe stress in March 2020. Prevalence of sleep disturbances was 54.8% in March 2020 and 57.4% at follow-up. Structural equation modelling highlighted that perceived stress in March 2020 significantly predicted sleep disturbances at follow up (β = 0.203; p < 0.001), even after controlling for baseline sleep disturbances. Results remained significant even after controlling for the effects of covariates including age, sex, depression and anxiety symptoms, and referring to psychological services (β = 0.179; p < 0.05). Findings confirm the high prevalence of stress symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and provide first longitudinal evidence for the effects of perceived stress on sleep disturbances during the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.3144

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study demonstrated a higher insomnia persistence rate compared to other pandemic studies, which have ranged from 2% to 37%.

    “However, we demonstrated a higher insomnia persistence rate compared to other pandemic studies, which have ranged from 2% to 37% [16, 19, 21–23].”

    From Insomnia is more likely to persist than remit after a time of stress and uncertainty: a longitudinal cohort study examining trajectories and predictors of insomnia symptoms (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Introduction reports pandemic-era prevalence of sleep disturbances, not insomnia persistence, and the Discussion compares sleep-disturbance prevalence with other reports. Searches for insomnia persistence and the 2%–37% range found no passage supporting that range. The citing authors’ statement about their own higher rate is not a finding attributed to Ballesio. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballesio, A., Zagaria, A., Musetti, A., Lenzo, V., Palagini, L., Quattropani, M. C., Vegni, E., Bonazza, F., Filosa, M., Manari, T., Freda, M. F., Saita, E., Castelnuovo, G., Plazzi, G., Lombardo, C., & Franceschini, C.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Università per Stranieri Dante Alighieri (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of Catania (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Ballesio, Andrea
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-03-28
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
919-926
ISSN
  • 1532-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-3005
OpenAlex
W4220773840
Cited by
32
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stress and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, perceived stress, sleep disorders, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, anxiety and depressive symptoms, longitudinal associations
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Sleep, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review