Cited by 360COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Prevalence of posttraumatic and general psychological stress during COVID-19: a rapid review and meta-analysis

Open access
Cooke, Jessica E., Eirich, Rachel, Racine, Nicole, Madigan, Sheri·2020·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests rates of posttraumatic stress and psychological stress in the general population are elevated due to COVID-19. However, a meta-analysis is needed to attain more precise prevalence estimates due to between-study variability. Thus, we performed a rapid review and meta-analysis of posttraumatic stress and general psychological stress symptoms during COVID-19. Electronic searches were conducted up to May 26th, 2020 using key terms: mental illness and COVID-19. A total of k = 14 non-overlapping studies were identified for inclusion. Random effects meta-analyses indicated that the pooled prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms and psychological stress in the general population was 23.88% and 24.84%, respectively. In both meta-analyses, the prevalence of stress symptoms was higher in unpublished compared to peer-reviewed studies. Overall, nearly one-in-four adults experienced significant stress due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological resources and services must be allocated to help address the mental health burden of COVID-19. High quality, longitudinal research on the long-term mental health effects of the pandemic is greatly needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113347

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies have shown that the pandemic has impacted on a variety of outcomes.

    “Although we do not have pre-pandemic data, longitudinal studies have shown that the pandemic has impacted on a variety of outcomes (Cooke et al., 2020).”

    From Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model (2021) · cites this paper as Cooke et al., 2020

    The Discussion reports high levels of posttraumatic and general psychological stress associated with COVID-19, supporting an impact on those outcomes. It also says most available studies were cross-sectional and that longitudinal studies were needed to determine how stress changed over time; it does not support the claim that longitudinal studies had already demonstrated impacts across a variety of outcomes. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • During the pandemic, nearly one in four adults had significant acute and traumatic stress and were considered candidates for intervention.

    “During the pandemic nearly one-in-four adults had significant acute and traumatic stress and were considered candidates for intervention [25].”

    From Overview of sleep management during COVID-19. (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Park, A.L., Velez, C.V., Kannan, K., & Chorpita, B.F. (2020). Stress, functioning, and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv.10.31234/osf.io/jmctvIndicates inclusion in the posttraumatic stress meta-analysis. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooke, J. E., Eirich, R., Racine, N., & Madigan, S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Madigan, Sheri
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
292
Pages
113347
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045745830
Cited by
360
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 11
FWCI
30.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Alberta Innovates
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, posttraumatic stress symptoms, psychological stress, prevalence, mental health
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review